Positive derivative and strictly increasing

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 8K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Isn't it true that if a function [itex]f(t)[/itex] satisfies [itex]f'(t) > 0[/itex] on some interval, then [itex]f[/itex] is STRICTLY increasing on that interval; i.e., that [itex]s < t[/itex] implies that [itex]f(s) < f(t)[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
In fact:
if x2>x1 implies that
f(x2)>f(x1)the derivative is:
[f(x2)-f(x1)]/(x2-x1)
(as x2 approach x1)

The numerator is positive and also the denominator (by hypothesis ) implies that:
f'(x)>0
 
Thanks, guys. I was pretty sure this was a MVT exercise, but I was so tired last night I couldn't force myself to get out of bed and look for paper and pencil to run through it :) I'm amazed I was actually able to phrase the question correctly.
 
Related to the topic at hand, if, on the other hand, f'(a) > 0, is there necessarily an interval of positive length that is centered at c, on which f is strictly increasing? I've though about this for a while now, and it seems to me the answer is no, but I just can't come up with a counterexample. I can imagine an ever oscillating function that never reaches f(a) when x > a, but since it constantly oscillates, you also can't pinpoint the endpoint of an interval, on which f would be strictly increasing.

Any thoughts on this, is this a good counterexample? And does anyone perhaps have a specific function in mind, one that isn't just vaguely described such as above in my previous paragraph?
 
Last edited: