Possible Energy Level Schemes for a Quantum Object with Three States

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proposing two energy-level schemes for a quantum object with three states, based on observed electromagnetic radiation emissions at 2.48 eV, 1.91 eV, and 0.57 eV. One participant has created an initial energy level scheme representing the absorption lines corresponding to these energies. The challenge arises in defining a second distinct energy-level scheme without revealing the first one, raising questions about how to differentiate between the two. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in illustrating energy transitions and the significance of understanding the relationship between emitted energies and possible quantum states. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of creativity and precision in quantum mechanics modeling.
baubletop
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we have reason to suspect that a certain quantum object has only three quantum states. When we excited such an object we observe that is emits electromagnetic radiation of three different energies: 2.48 eV (green), 1.91 eV (orange), and 0.57 eV (infrared). Propose two possible energy-level schemes for this system.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I drew the energy level scheme for the given energies, which I suppose would represent the absorption lines, but what would a second energy-level scheme involve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't show the one you found, how would someone know what will be a different one?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top