MHB Possible webpage title: Which Primes Make p!+p a Perfect Square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying prime numbers p for which the expression p! + p is a perfect square. The initial findings confirm that for p = 2 and p = 3, the expression yields perfect squares. Using Wilson's theorem, the relationship p! + p = p[(p-1)! + 1] is established, indicating that (p-1)! + 1 must be divisible by p. Further analysis suggests that for larger primes, the factorial grows too rapidly, making it unlikely for p! + p to equal a perfect square. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the difficulty in extending the findings beyond small primes.
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Find all prime numbers p for which p!+p is a perfect square.

My thoughts: 2!+2 and 3!+3 are perfect squares.
p!+p=p[(p-1)!+1]
By Wilson's theorem, (p-1)!+1 is divisible by p. Now I'm stuck.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
Find all prime numbers p for which p!+p is a perfect square. My thoughts: 2!+2 and 3!+3 are perfect squares. p!+p=p[(p-1)!+1] By Wilson's theorem, (p-1)!+1 is divisible by p. Now I'm stuck.
Well, you are almost done. (p - 1)! + 1 = kp p! + p = kp^2 so we see that k must be a perfect square to satisfy your condition. let k = m^2 p!+p = (mp)^2 also p!+p = c^2 c^2 = (mp)^2 p = c/m now if m = 1 then c = p and p!+p = p^2 that's only going to happen for 2!, 3! cause they have few products. As the primes get larger than 3 the p! has too many products destroying any possibility that p!+p = p^2 Now I'm stuck cause i can't think of a good reason why m can't be any other positive integer...

---------- Post added at 07:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------

why are all the sentences getting bunched up??
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K