Possibly simplistic question about massive moving objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Studentyguy
  • Start date Start date
Studentyguy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. Can someone check my logic here please?

I think I have a pretty good grasp of the basics of special relativity, but I'm wondering about something. When a massive object approaches the speed of light, it's mass increases. So, as it gets closer and closer to the speed of light, it's mass approaches infinity. So it's gravitational force approaches infinity. Does this mean that any massive object going sufficiently near the speed of light effectively becomes a black hole?

I suspect that general relativity would have to be involved, but I don't have any real knowledge of that; I can only take that course in two years time!

Can anyone help me out, and/or point me towards a good source to explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider 3 observers, A, B and C. Suppose that A sees B receeding very close to the speed of light, but C sees B receeding at a much lower speed. If objects could turn into BHs merely from relative velocity, then it's possible that A will see B become a BH, and C will not. This could lead to a causal paradox. It will definitely cause an argument between A and C.:smile:
 
Thanks, that clears things up!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top