Potential across a conducting sphere surrounded by an insulator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the thickness of a protective layer of barium titanate applied to a conducting sphere with a radius of 2.25 m and a charge of 35.0 mC. The required potential difference between the surface of the conductor and the outer layer is 20,000 V. Through the application of Gauss' law for dielectrics and voltage drop equations, the final radius was determined to be 2.7 m, leading to a calculated thickness of approximately 0.45 m. The calculations were verified and corrected for accuracy, confirming the thickness as 0.47 m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law for dielectrics
  • Familiarity with electric potential and voltage drop calculations
  • Knowledge of dielectric constants, specifically for barium titanate
  • Ability to perform unit conversions for electrical charge
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss' law in electrostatics
  • Learn about dielectric materials and their properties
  • Investigate the relationship between electric potential and electric field
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics, such as capacitance and energy storage
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and materials science who are involved in electrostatics and dielectric materials applications.

arturo
Messages
18
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A conducting sphere has a radius of 2.25 m and carries a positive surplus charge of 35.0 mC. A protective layer of barium titanate is applied to the surface of the sphere to make it safe for laboratory workers nearby. Safety considerations dictate that the potential difference between the surface of the conductor and the outside of the nonconductive layer must be 20,000 V.
How thick must the protective layer be?
Express your answer using two significant digits.

1200 = dielectric constant of barium titanate.

Homework Equations


  • Gauss' law for dielectrics:
  • ∫E⋅da = qfree, enc/(εκ)
  • v = -∫E⋅dl

The Attempt at a Solution


I began by creating a spherical gaussian surface around the object:
∫E⋅da = qfree, enc/(εκ)
EA = qfree, enc/(εκ)
E4πr2 = qfree, enc/(εκ)
E = qfree, enc/(εκ4πr2)

Then I set up the integral for V:
V = -∫E⋅dl
V = -∫qfree, enc/(εκ4πr2) dr

We want the voltage drop from the surface (r = 2.25m) to some R where ΔV = 20,000.
ΔV = -∫2.25R qfree, enc/(εκ4πr2) dr
ΔV =qfree, enc/(εκ4π*2.25)- qfree, enc/(εκ4πR])
20,000 = qfree, enc/(εκ4π*2.25)- qfree, enc/(εκ4πR])
R = 1.32*10-2

Which is incorrect. Any pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arturo said:
ΔV =qfree, enc/(εκ4π*2.25)- qfree, enc/(εκ4πR])
20,000 = qfree, enc/(εκ4π*2.25)- qfree, enc/(εκ4πR])
I think these equations are OK. But I don't get your answer for R. Try solving the first equation listed here for 1/R before substituting any numbers.
 
Thanks for replying!
Okay, one thing I noticed was I accidentally use the wrong multiplier to convert the charge to coulombs, but I'm still incorrect.
20,000 = q/(4πε0κ) [1/2.25 - 1/R]
.076 = [1/2.25 - 1/R]
.368 = 1/R
R = 2.7 ...
 
arturo said:
R = 2.7 ...
OK. What did you get for the thickness of the dielectric?
 
Sorry I got caught up in noticing my mistake with the power of ten that I didn't do it in variables.
ΔV⋅κ⋅4πε/q = [ 1/Rinital - 1/RFinal
ΔV⋅κ⋅4πε/q + 1/Rinital = 1/RFinal

Your comment + typing it out like this I realize that the R I'm solving for is the final radius not the thickness.
so Thickness = 2.7-2.25 = .45 meters
Does this sound correct?

Edit:
Fixed a typo
 
Last edited:
Yes. I got about .47 m.
 
arturo said:
ΔV⋅κ⋅4πε/q = [ 1/Rinital - 1/RFinal
ΔV⋅κ⋅4πε/q - 1/Rinital = 1/RFinal
I believe you have a sign error in the second equation. Maybe just a typo.
 
Re- ran through the calculations got .47 (.465).
Thank you so much for your help. You guys are always great.

Edit:
TSny said:
I believe you have a sign error in the second equation. Maybe just a typo.
yeah, just a typo
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K