Potential Difference between Two Points affected by a Dipole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the potential difference between two points affected by a dipole, specifically with charges q1 = +6 nC and q2 = -6 nC, and a dipole separation of s = 4 mm. The electric field along the y-axis is given by E vector = 0, 1/4πε0 * 2qs/y^3 V/m. The potential difference is derived using the equation delta V = - integral of i -> f (E vector * delta L vector), leading to the final result of delta V = -4.8e+2 V. The integration approach simplifies the calculation, confirming the accuracy of the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipoles and their properties
  • Familiarity with electric field equations, specifically E vector = 0, 1/4πε0 * 2qs/y^3
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Proficiency in applying the concept of potential difference in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric field equations for dipoles
  • Learn about the integration of electric fields to find potential differences
  • Explore the implications of dipole moments in electrostatics
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving integrals in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in mastering the concepts of electric fields and potential differences in electrostatics.

Oribe Yasuna
Messages
43
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A dipole is centered at the origin, with its axis along the y axis, so that at locations on the y axis, the electric field due to the dipole is given by
E vector =
leftangle1.gif
0, 1/4πε0 * 2qs/y^3, 0
rightangle1.gif
V/m
The charges making up the dipole are q1 = +6 nC and q2 = -6 nC and the dipole separation is s = 4 mm (see figure below). What is the potential difference along a path starting at location P1 =
leftangle0.gif
0, 0.02, 0
rightangle0.gif
m and ending at location P2 =
leftangle0.gif
0, 0.06, 0
rightangle0.gif
m?

709adee12d.png


Homework Equations


delta V = - integral of i -> f (E vector * delta L vector)

The Attempt at a Solution


delta V = 2qs/4πε0 ( 1/P2^3 - 1/P1^3 ) * 0.04
delta V = 9e+9 * 2(6e-9)(0.004) * ( 1/(0.06)^3 - 1/(0.02)^3 ) * 0.04
delta V = -2.08e+3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your relevant equations you indicated that finding the potential difference involves integrating the electric field along the path between the points of interest. I don't see you doing that in your solution attempt. It would appear that you're just taking the difference in the field strength at each location and multiplying by the path length.
 
I wanted to avoid doing an integral and instead get an estimate. I suppose that's an unreasonable expectation, though.

Then, this is the integral I set up:
delta V = integral of 0.02 -> 0.06 [(1 / 4*pi*E0) * (2*6e-9*0.004 / y^3) * (<dx, dy, dz>)]

I know:
delta L = <dx, dy, dz>
delta L = 0.04 m

Does <dx, dy, dz> mean I have to derive delta L? If so, how do I derive a constant without getting 0?
 
The path indicated is along one direction, and happens to be along one particular axis, so you can ignore the other components. So your "delta L" is just dy.

I suggest that you perform the integration symbolically first, using variables as the limits of the integration. Plug in numbers at the end.
 
Alright.

Since this is on the y-coordinate I'll exclude the x & z coordinates of the vectors:
delta V = integral of P1 -> P2 (1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s / y^3) dy
delta V = 1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s * integral of P1 -> P2 (1 / y^3) dy

In this form, the problem seems to become easier than I expected it to be.
If I recall correctly, the integral of 1 / y^3 is:
-1 / 2 y^2

So the integral of 1 / y^3 from P1 to P2 would be:
[ - 1 / 2 (P1)^2 + 1 / 2 (P2)^2 ]

Plugging this back in:
delta V = 1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s * (- 1 / 2 P1^2 + 1 / 2 P2^2)

is this correct so far?
 
Last edited:
I plugged in the numbers and I got -4.8e+2 (-4.8 * 10^2).

The answer was correct.
Thanks for the help, I probably would have over-complicated things without it.
 
Yes, looking good. Carry on!

Edit: Oops! too late! :smile:

Well done.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K