Potential Difference between Two Points affected by a Dipole

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the potential difference between two points in the electric field created by a dipole. The dipole is positioned along the y-axis, with specific charge values and separation distance provided. Participants are exploring the integration of the electric field to determine the potential difference along a defined path.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of integrating the electric field to find the potential difference, with some expressing a desire to avoid integration for estimation. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the differential path length and how to approach the integration symbolically.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the integration process, with some participants providing guidance on simplifying the integration by focusing on the relevant axis. A participant has successfully set up the integral and is verifying their steps, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of avoiding over-complication and ensuring the correct application of integration techniques in the context of the problem. There is a focus on maintaining clarity in the mathematical setup without jumping to conclusions.

Oribe Yasuna
Messages
43
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A dipole is centered at the origin, with its axis along the y axis, so that at locations on the y axis, the electric field due to the dipole is given by
E vector =
leftangle1.gif
0, 1/4πε0 * 2qs/y^3, 0
rightangle1.gif
V/m
The charges making up the dipole are q1 = +6 nC and q2 = -6 nC and the dipole separation is s = 4 mm (see figure below). What is the potential difference along a path starting at location P1 =
leftangle0.gif
0, 0.02, 0
rightangle0.gif
m and ending at location P2 =
leftangle0.gif
0, 0.06, 0
rightangle0.gif
m?

709adee12d.png


Homework Equations


delta V = - integral of i -> f (E vector * delta L vector)

The Attempt at a Solution


delta V = 2qs/4πε0 ( 1/P2^3 - 1/P1^3 ) * 0.04
delta V = 9e+9 * 2(6e-9)(0.004) * ( 1/(0.06)^3 - 1/(0.02)^3 ) * 0.04
delta V = -2.08e+3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your relevant equations you indicated that finding the potential difference involves integrating the electric field along the path between the points of interest. I don't see you doing that in your solution attempt. It would appear that you're just taking the difference in the field strength at each location and multiplying by the path length.
 
I wanted to avoid doing an integral and instead get an estimate. I suppose that's an unreasonable expectation, though.

Then, this is the integral I set up:
delta V = integral of 0.02 -> 0.06 [(1 / 4*pi*E0) * (2*6e-9*0.004 / y^3) * (<dx, dy, dz>)]

I know:
delta L = <dx, dy, dz>
delta L = 0.04 m

Does <dx, dy, dz> mean I have to derive delta L? If so, how do I derive a constant without getting 0?
 
The path indicated is along one direction, and happens to be along one particular axis, so you can ignore the other components. So your "delta L" is just dy.

I suggest that you perform the integration symbolically first, using variables as the limits of the integration. Plug in numbers at the end.
 
Alright.

Since this is on the y-coordinate I'll exclude the x & z coordinates of the vectors:
delta V = integral of P1 -> P2 (1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s / y^3) dy
delta V = 1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s * integral of P1 -> P2 (1 / y^3) dy

In this form, the problem seems to become easier than I expected it to be.
If I recall correctly, the integral of 1 / y^3 is:
-1 / 2 y^2

So the integral of 1 / y^3 from P1 to P2 would be:
[ - 1 / 2 (P1)^2 + 1 / 2 (P2)^2 ]

Plugging this back in:
delta V = 1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s * (- 1 / 2 P1^2 + 1 / 2 P2^2)

is this correct so far?
 
Last edited:
I plugged in the numbers and I got -4.8e+2 (-4.8 * 10^2).

The answer was correct.
Thanks for the help, I probably would have over-complicated things without it.
 
Yes, looking good. Carry on!

Edit: Oops! too late! :smile:

Well done.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K