Potential difference in an alternator

AI Thread Summary
In an alternator, there is indeed a potential difference across its outputs, which varies rapidly unlike a battery. The energy associated with the movement of electrons is not primarily their kinetic energy, as the electrons move slowly and their kinetic energy is negligible in typical circuits. Instead, the energy can be conceptualized as potential energy, as the magnetic field moves electrons from a lower to a higher potential. This movement results in a change in electric potential, increasing the electrons' potential energy. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping how energy is transferred in alternators.
gigie
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi,

In a current generated by an alternator, can we really say that there is a potential difference like in a battery?

The magnetic field exerts a force on the electrons which makes them move. We can calculate the work done to the electrons in joules, and we can divide this energy by the amount of charge in coulomb which gives a voltage (J/C) but this energy calculated gives the kinetic energy of the electrons, not their potential energy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gigie said:
this energy calculated gives the kinetic energy of the electrons
No, the energy you described is most definitely not the KE of the electrons. In an ordinary circuit the KE of the electrons is negligible.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
gigie said:
In a current generated by an alternator, can we really say that there is a potential difference like in a battery?
Yes, there is a potential difference across the outputs of an alternator. Unlike a battery output, the potential difference varies rapidlywith time; how much variation depends on the details of the rectifiers and voltage regulator circuitry as well as the speed that we're spinning the alternator.

And as Dale says, the kinetic energy of the electrons in a circuit is pretty much completely unrelated to the potential; this is true for a battery as well as for an alternator.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
Dale said:
No, the energy you described is most definitely not the KE of the electrons. In an ordinary circuit the KE of the electrons is negligible.

But the magnetic field makes the electrons MOVE... how is it not kinetic energy? What is this energy?

If it is potential energy, could you help me conceptualize how it is potential energy?
 
gigie said:
But the magnetic field makes the electrons MOVE... how is it not kinetic energy? What is this energy?
The electrons do move and therefore do have KE, but they move very slowly and weigh very little so the amount of KE is utterly insignificant in ordinary circuits. You can do the calculation or find them done somewhere on PF.
gigie said:
If it is potential energy, could you help me conceptualize how it is potential energy?
The fields themselves have an associated energy density. It is proportional to the square of the field, so if you double the field then you quadruple the energy density. The fields can also transfer energy to other locations or do work on matter. It is called Poyntings theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995 and vanhees71
gigie said:
But the magnetic field makes the electrons MOVE... how is it not kinetic energy? What is this energy?
Yes, the electrons are moved by the magnetic field, or should that be swept or lifted by the magnetic field, from a conductor of low potential to a conductor of higher potential. The electrons then have a higher potential energy, due to their change in electric potential or voltage.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top