Potential difference on complex circuits

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the potential difference in complex circuits, with participants sharing methods, calculations, and challenges related to both basic and complex circuit analysis. The scope includes theoretical understanding, practical application, and problem-solving strategies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about finding potential difference in both complex and basic circuits, seeking guidance.
  • Another participant suggests diagnostic tests and requests specific answers to voltmeter readings in various scenarios.
  • A participant shares their calculations for potential differences across various components, indicating some confidence but also expressing doubt in certain steps.
  • Alternative methods for calculating potential differences are proposed, including different approaches to evaluating resistors in parallel.
  • A participant mentions a voltage divider technique as a useful shortcut for determining voltages without calculating current first.
  • There is a reference to Kirchhoff's laws as a foundational concept for analyzing circuit behavior.
  • One participant seeks clarification on a specific calculation, indicating they are still grappling with certain concepts.
  • Another participant asserts that the potential difference across a battery is equal to its emf, emphasizing the importance of understanding this relationship.
  • There is a discussion about the process of determining current paths and potential drops across resistances, with some uncertainty expressed about the terminology used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share methods and calculations, but there are differing approaches and some uncertainty regarding the best methods for finding potential differences. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views and techniques presented.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations and assumptions are not fully detailed, and there are unresolved steps in the reasoning presented by participants. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with circuit analysis concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in circuit analysis, particularly those seeking to understand potential differences in complex circuits, may find this discussion beneficial.

Cetullah
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
****WARNING-THIS IS NOT A HOMEWORK-WARNING****

Hello dear Physics Forums users,

I have no idea about how to find the potential difference between two points in a complex circuit. I m not even sure if I really know how to find it in a basic circuit. Please help me and enlighten me with your wisdom and experience. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We need some diagnostic tests. Try the ones on the attached thumb-nail. Work out what the voltmeter reads in each case. Give us your answers, or tell us where – if anywhere – you get stuck.
 

Attachments

  • PFvoltage.jpg
    PFvoltage.jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 822
Thanks for spending time on that. I think I have solved them, here are my steps:

a)Req=18+6=24

12/24=0.5 A

0.5*6=3 V

b) 0.3=12/(6+R)

R=34

34*0.3=10.2

c)2-0.5=1.5 A

1.5*5=7.5 V, which is equal the one on the parallel line.

d) Well eh, with some doubt:

1/(18+6)+1/(3+9)=1/Req

Req=8

12/8=1.5 A

1.5/3=0.5

Current on left line=0.5*2

Current on right line= 0.5*1

The voltage difference= 18*0.5-3*1=6
 
Well, you've certainly got the basic ideas! Here are some comments/alternative methods...

(b) Alternatively, p.d. across 6Ω = 6 x 0.3 = 1.8 V,
So pd across lower resistor = 12 - 1.8 = 10.2 V.

(c) And top voltmeter reads 12 - 7.5 = 4.5 V

(d) No need to evaluate resistors in parallel.
Left and right branches each have 12 V across them
So pd across 3Ω = [itex]\frac{3}{12}\times12[/itex] = 3 V,
And p.d. across 18Ω =[itex]\frac{18}{24}\times12[/itex] = 9 V,
So lhs of voltmeter is 3 V downhill from the top, and rhs of voltmeter is 9 V downhill from the top, so rhs of voltmeter is 6 V downhill from lhs of voltmeter.

Can you now supply a problem of the sort which gives you trouble?
 
Cetullah - Perhaps worth a look at this trick you can use to avoid a two stage approach..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_divider

Allows you to work out voltages without first explicitly calculating the current.
 
Yes indeed.
This is one of the tricks I used in (d) above.
 
That is one of the kind of problems I get stuck with, in the attachment. :/

Sorry for the super paint skills by the way :D
 

Attachments

  • va-vb.png
    va-vb.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 693
Hope you're familiar with Kirchhoff's laws...

See thumb-nail.

Get back if you're not happy.
 

Attachments

  • PFKirchhoff.jpg
    PFKirchhoff.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 683
Thank you for the effort Philip. I m familiar with the Kirchhoff's laws, however the part that I ve been requesting aid for was the "simple" Step 7 :3 Can you explain a little bit, about how did you find the voltage difference, please?
 
  • #10
The 40 V battery has no internal resistance, so the p.d. across its terminals (i.e. between A and B) is equal to its emf: 40 V.
 
  • #11
Oh, now things started to settle :) So, first we find which path every current follows, then if there are any resistances along the path, we just find the potential spent on resistance, then substract it from the positive potentials. I m not sure if I have managed to tell the thing in my mind, but correct me if I m wrong. :)
 
  • #12
Yes, though I'm not sure we do "find the path every current follows".

Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K