Potential energies and finding the distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seung Lee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energies Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a compressed spring and a hockey puck, where the spring constant is 15.19 N/m, and the puck has a mass of 170 g with a friction coefficient of 0.02221. Participants express confusion over the calculated distance the puck travels, which is significantly larger than the initial compression of the spring (23.11 cm). The key point is that the energy from the spring is converted into kinetic energy and is also used to overcome friction, leading to two phases of motion: one while the puck is still in contact with the spring and another after it detaches. The equations used to relate these energies are clarified, emphasizing the need to account for energy loss due to friction during both phases. Ultimately, the calculated distance of approximately 11 meters is deemed plausible, suggesting that the initial assumption about the puck traveling only 23.11 cm may not hold true due to the low friction coefficient.
Seung Lee
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal spring with psring constant k = 15.19 N/m is compressed 23.11 cm fro mits equil. position.
A hockey puck with mass m = 170.0g is placed against the end of the spring. The friction coefficient is 0.02221.
How far does the hockey puck travel?

k = 15.19 N/m
x = 0.2311
uk = 0.02221
m = 0.17

Homework Equations


1/2mv^2 = 1/2kx^2 = friction force potential

The Attempt at a Solution


x = (kx^2)/ ( 2*0.02221*mg) = 10.9m

x should be equal to 23.11 cm...

I really don't understand why I keep getting a huge number when it shold actually be 23.11 cm. Also, I do understand tat 1/2mv^2 = 1/2kx^2 but why is any of those = to frictional force potential?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like these problems, but they are often beyond my abilities. However, I'll try to help...

I believe that there are two phases. First, the spring decompresses, and its energy is partly used up to move the puck against friction. With the rest of energy that is left, the puck acquires a velocity v, and its kinetic energy is used up moving the puck away, at a constant deceleration, against the friction force...
 
Isn't that why the equation is 1/2mv^2 = 1/2kx^2 = frictional potential? I mean another problem is that the answer keeps being 10.96m instead of actualyl beeing a small number
 
Seung Lee said:
Isn't that why the equation is 1/2mv^2 = 1/2kx^2 = frictional potential?

The equation has no sense. You might have misread it. The second "equal" has to be "minus".

The initial elastic energy of the compressed spring is converted partly to the kinetic energy of the puck, and the other part is used as work against friction:

1/2 mv2=1/2 kx2-W(friction) where W(friction) = mguk and x=0.2311 cm is the compression of the spring.

ehild
 
yeah, but you still can't solve for the distance can you? i mean you need the distance in W(friction) and you also don't ahve the velocity in 1/2mv^2, which means you have two unknowns in one equation.
 
First find the kinetic energy the puck acquires until it leaves the spring. During that time is travels x1=0.2311 cm. When the spring gets released the puck gets detached from the spring, and moves further, loosing energy because of friction. Calculate the distance x2 traveled till the puck stops. The total distance is x=x1+x2
 
ehild said:
First find the kinetic energy the puck acquires until it leaves the spring. During that time is travels x1=0.2311 cm. When the spring gets released the puck gets detached from the spring, and moves further, loosing energy because of friction. Calculate the distance x2 traveled till the puck stops. The total distance is x=x1+x2

And don't forget, Seung, that there's energy loss to friction also during the expansion of the spring.
 
Seung Lee said:

The Attempt at a Solution


x = (kx^2)/ ( 2*0.02221*mg) = 10.9m

x should be equal to 23.11 cm...
Why do think that the total distance that the puck travels is 23.11 cm? Wasn't that the initial distance that the spring was compressed? I mean, it's possible that it could be true if the total energy lost to friction happens to be equal to the total energy initially stored in the spring. But the coefficient of friction looks to be too small for that to be true given that short distance (Compare the energy stored in the spring versus the energy lost to friction over that distance).

Your calculated result of around 11 m looks plausible to me.
 
Back
Top