Potential Energy After Escape Velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of potential energy in the context of an object achieving escape velocity from a planet's gravitational field. When an object reaches escape velocity, it transitions from a state of negative potential energy (due to gravitational binding) to a state where its potential energy becomes zero as it moves far away from the planet. The total mechanical energy, which is the sum of kinetic and potential energy, remains constant throughout this process, illustrating the conservation of energy principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy and its relationship with velocity
  • Familiarity with the concept of escape velocity
  • Basic principles of energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of escape velocity
  • Explore the concept of negative potential energy in gravitational systems
  • Learn about energy conservation in closed systems
  • Investigate the implications of potential energy in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding energy dynamics in gravitational fields.

metapad
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm not quite sure I'm understanding potential energy correctly. Let's say we have a runaway planet in deep space which is going in a perfectly straight line. The planet is perfectly spherical and doesn't have an atmosphere. If an object on the surface spontaneously (for the sake of simplicity as it's not the point) acquires a high upward velocity, it's kinetic energy should gradually be converted to potential energy as gravity slows it down, right? Well let's say that when the object was launched it had achieved escape velocity and eventually escapes the planet's gravity and drifts away from the planet. Let's say the object never gets caught in the planet's field of gravity again. Since it's not going to go near the planet again, where did all of that potential energy go? Energy can't be created or destroyed so the potential energy can't just simply disappear... I'm confused X_X
 
Physics news on Phys.org
metapad said:
Since it's not going to go near the planet again, where did all of that potential energy go? Energy can't be created or destroyed so the potential energy can't just simply disappear... I'm confused X_X

It went into its freedom :-)
Consider this: you have a debt. You also have an income. Your income is used to pay back that debt, so at a certain point, you've paid back everything. Your debt doesn't exist anymore. Where did all the money of your income go ?

What happens is that gravitationally (or otherwise) bound systems have a *negative* potential energy as compared to free systems. They must first pay back their debt of binding energy before they can be free. Otherwise they remain bound.
 
metapad said:
I'm not quite sure I'm understanding potential energy correctly. Let's say we have a runaway planet in deep space which is going in a perfectly straight line. The planet is perfectly spherical and doesn't have an atmosphere. If an object on the surface spontaneously (for the sake of simplicity as it's not the point) acquires a high upward velocity,
it's kinetic energy should gradually be converted to potential energy as gravity slows it down, right? Well let's say that when the object was launched it had achieved escape velocity and eventually escapes the planet's gravity and drifts away from the planet. Let's say the object never gets caught in the planet's field of gravity again. Since it's not going to go near the planet again, where did all of that potential energy go? Energy can't be created or destroyed so the potential energy can't just simply disappear... I'm confused X_X

the kinetic energy of the launched object is initially some positive number and the potential energy (relative to infinity) is some negative number. When the rocket is far away (never to be seen by the planet again) the kinetic energy is some smaller positive number and the potential energy is zero. The sum of the kinetic and potential energy is constant throughout the process.
 
Ohh... Suppose that makes sense. Thanks :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K