Potential energy and conservation of energy problem

AI Thread Summary
An outfielder throws a baseball with an initial speed of 79.0 mi/h, which converts to 35.32 m/s, while its final speed before being caught is 65 ft/s or 19.81 m/s. The problem involves calculating the mechanical energy dissipated by air drag, with the baseball's weight given as 9 oz. The kinetic energy change is calculated using the formula ΔKE=1/2mvf² - 1/2mvi², resulting in a value of -109.02 J. Clarification is sought regarding the use of "weight" versus "mass" in calculations, and there is confusion about converting units when the final answer is required in ft-lbs. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent unit usage throughout the problem-solving process.
magnolia1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An outfielder throws a baseball with an initial speed of 79.0 mi/h. Just before an infielder catches the ball at the same level, its speed is 65 ft/s. How much of the ball's mechanical energy is dissipated by air drag? (The weight of a baseball is 9 oz.)

Homework Equations



ke=1/2mv2
ug=mgh
Emec = ΔU + ΔK

ANSWER IS: 80.4 ft*lb

The Attempt at a Solution


Converting knowns to metres/second:
79.0 mi/h (0.44704) = 35.32 m/s
65 ft/s (0.3048) = 19.81 m/s

When they say "weight" do they mean
fg=9 oz. = 2.5 N
or
mass= 9 oz. = 0.255 kg

ΔKE=1/2mvf2-1/2mvi2
=1/2(0.255)(19.81)2-1/2(0.255)(35.32)2
=50.0356-159.0565
=-109.02 J

This is where I wasn't sure how to continue..
Any help is appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi magnolia1! :wink:
magnolia1 said:
(The weight of a baseball is 9 oz.)

When they say "weight" do they mean
fg=9 oz. = 2.5 N
or
mass= 9 oz. = 0.255 kg

in the ft-lb system, the pound (and the ounce) is a force

so "weight" is used instead of mass (and has the g already in it)

(the unit of mass is the slug)

anyway, why have you converted to metres etc when the required answer is in ft-lbs ?? :confused:

start again :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top