Potential Energy and energy conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of potential energy and work in physics, specifically the equations for gravitational and elastic work. The user is confused about the relationship between the new work equations and those from a previous chapter, particularly regarding a ball thrown vertically. Clarification reveals that the net work done by gravity is zero when the ball returns to its original height, but the work done during the fall can be calculated using both methods, yielding consistent results. Additionally, the user inquires whether internal energy is equivalent to work done by non-conservative forces, indicating a need for further understanding of energy conservation principles. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying work equations in different contexts.
kyin01
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, so I was going to start on my HW but there was some things confusing me when reading the book.
This is calculus based (feel free to use integrals) and we are on the concept of potential and total mechanical energy and such.1) This new chapter we are on introduces
Work_{grav}=mgh_{1} -mgh_{2} (1 being above 2) and

Work_{el}=.5kx_{1} ^{2} - .5kx_{2} ^{2}

However in the previous chapter we were told that W_{net}=\DeltaK_{energy} or W=F\bullet _{net} \vec{s}

So my question is, if the Work introduced now the same kind of work as we were told in the previous chapter?
I tried setting an quick example, let's assume we throw a ball of 10kg vertically upwards and it reaches a maximum height of 5m and than goes back down. Gravity is 10\frac{m}{s^{2}}. So let's pretend no air resistance and such and we are trying to find work.
If I use this equation W=F_{net}\bullet\vec{s}, I get work is = to 50J
but if I use the new equation Work_{grav}=mgh_{1} -mgh_{2}, work is = to 500

So what is it I am not understanding? Are they 2 different kind of work?2) Is internal energy (U_{int}) the same as work done by non conservative forces (W_{nc})?

edit: i have no idea why the subscripts appear as superscripts, I tried editing and fix but it still appears as superscripts. If it's not clear enough please let me know I'll make them into pictures in MSPaint and post or something
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kyin01 said:
So my question is, if the Work introduced now the same kind of work as we were told in the previous chapter?
Sure.
I tried setting an quick example, let's assume we throw a ball of 10kg vertically upwards and it reaches a maximum height of 5m and than goes back down. Gravity is 10\frac{m}{s^{2}}. So let's pretend no air resistance and such and we are trying to find work.
If the ball goes up and down, the net work done by gravity is zero. (The work is negative on the way up, positive on the way down.)

Let's say you want the work done by gravity when a ball falls from a height of 5m to the ground, which is what I think you were calculating.
If I use this equation W=F_{net}\bullet\vec{s}, I get work is = to 50J
How did you get this? The force = mg = 100N. If we call the distance h=5m, the work done = mgh = (100)*5 = 500 J.
but if I use the new equation Work_{grav}=mgh_{1} -mgh_{2}, work is = to 500
This also gives you mgh = 500 J.
 
Ahh, sorry I see it now. Thanks

So is Is internal energy the same as work done by non conservative forces?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top