Potential Energy of a compressed gas cylinder

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential energy of a compressed gas cylinder, particularly in the context of engineering applications where a gas cylinder is being considered as a replacement for a steel compression spring. Participants explore the calculations involved in determining the potential energy and force response of the gas cylinder during impact, while addressing the complexities of gas behavior under compression.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the challenge of predicting the force response of a gas cylinder during impact, noting that the force increases non-linearly as the cylinder is compressed.
  • Another participant provides a general formula for work done in compressing a gas cylinder, suggesting that the integral of force over distance must be calculated, but indicates that the integral involves a logarithmic function.
  • There is a discussion about whether the compression process is adiabatic or isothermal, with some participants asserting that temperature changes must be considered during sudden compression.
  • A participant references a previous thread discussing work done during adiabatic expansion and shares a formula related to that context, while also expressing confusion over unit consistency in the derived equations.
  • Another participant suggests that if a consistent system of units is followed, the units should ultimately align, but points out a potential math error in the calculations presented by the original poster.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the compression process (adiabatic vs. isothermal) and the implications for temperature changes. There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating potential energy or the units involved, as participants challenge and refine each other's claims without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the calculations involved, particularly with respect to the assumptions about gas behavior and the need for careful unit management. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly regarding the integration of force over distance.

Sean Powell
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This is not a homework problem, but an engineering office problem.

I’m looking to replace a steel compression spring with a gas cylinder. The spring is presently designed to absorb a known amount of kinetic energy which it ideally converts to potential energy (neglecting friction, yadda yadda) and compression is solvable by a simple formula. PE = ½*K*dL assuming the spring was fully relaxed to start.

When I impact a closed gas cylinder the force response is governed by PV=nRT and we can generally assume no major temperature changes during impact. That means force doubles at half stroke, quadruples at ¾ stroke, is 10 times at 90% stroke etc. I know enough to subtract ambient air pressure to get a correct baseline. My problem is the force is so low for the first half of the stroke and climbs so rapidly for the last 20% or so that I’m having a tough time predicting the response of stopping a rolling vehicle impact.

Ideally I need a formula for potential energy in a compressed gas cylinder if I know: Diameter, L1 (usually free length), P1 (usually atmospheric), L2 (new compressed length) and some basic assumptions like human breathable atmosphere not too far from sea level.

From here I think I can calculate peak force so I know how to design the ratchet mechanism so the car isn’t rebounded. Yes, I know I could probably do this better with a dampened spring but there are other design issues (and patents to get around).

Thanks in advance,
Sean
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whether it's a spring or an isothermal (or adiabatic) gas cylinder being compressed, the general formula for work done in compressing is:

W = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} F(x) dx

which for a relaxed spring is

W = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} K \cdot (x-x_1) dx = \frac{1}{2} K (x_2-x_1)^2.

for the gas cylinder, you have to define what the dimensions of it are (the radius of the cross section, call it r_0, and its length L. I'm setting x_1 to zero, with no loss of generality. the ambient pressure is P_0 = nRT/(\pi r_0^2 L)

W = \int_{0}^{X} F(x) dx = \int_{0}^{X} \frac{P(x)-P_0}{\pi r_0^2} dx = \int_{0}^{X} \frac{nRT/\left(V(x)\right) - P_0}{\pi r_0^2} dx

= \int_{0}^{X} \frac{nRT/\left(\pi r_0^2 \cdot(L-x)\right)-P_0}{\pi r_0^2} dx

someone's got to blast out that integral for me. it has a log() in it, that's all that i know. everything other than x is constant.
 
Last edited:
Sean Powell said:
When I impact a closed gas cylinder the force response is governed by PV=nRT and we can generally assume no major temperature changes during impact.

rbj said:
W = \int_{0}^{X} F(x) dx = \int_{0}^{X} \frac{P(x)-P_0}{\pi r_0^2} dx = \int_{0}^{X} \frac{nRT/\left(V(x)\right) - P_0}{\pi r_0^2} dx

= \int_{0}^{X} \frac{nRT/\left(\pi r_0^2 \cdot(L-x)\right)-P_0}{\pi r_0^2} dx

someone's got to blast out that integral for me. it has a log() in it, that's all that i know. everything other than x is constant.

When a volume of gas is compressed suddenly, it is generally an adiabatic process, and no heat is exchanged with the environment. But the temperature will change, and that has to be taken into account.

I have given a simple and rough treatment for another situation much like this in another thread. It's nothing but work done during adiabatic expansion. Perhaps you can have a look at it.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1471310#post1471310
 
Last edited:
Shooting star said:
When a volume of gas is compressed suddenly, it is generally an adiabatic process, and no heat is exchanged with the environment. But the temperature will change, and that has to be taken into account.

I have given a simple and rough treatment for another situation much like this in another thread. It's nothing but work done during adiabatic expansion. Perhaps you can have a look at it.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1471310#post1471310

Hello Shooting Star.
Thanks for the input. You are correct, while system transfers no heat to the surroundings there probably is a sudden increase in temperature. That was something I did not consider.

In your link you submitted the following formula:
****
Since the process is quick, we’ll consider it to be adiabatic. Then, PV^g=K, where I am writing ‘g’ for gamma. For air, g=7/5. The value of K can be obtained by putting in the initial values of P and V, which you had given.

Work done= integral (P-Pa)dV between V1 and V2, where V1 is the volume of the compression chamber and V2 is (V1+volume of barrel), and Pa is the outside pressure.

After integrating, W=K[V2^(-g+1)-V1^(-g+1)]/(-g+1) – Pa(V2-V1).
****
Which I think I follow fairly well and have all of the relavent information to fill out and calculate... but the units don't seem to be working out for me. Assuming gamma is unitless, P is N/m^2 & V is m^3 then K has the units of N*m^21/10? The (-g+1) term becomes -2/5 and after a bunch of crunching I see N*m^1.5 for the first chunk of the equation while the right hand portion is N/m^2*m^3 => N*m (please excuse my sloppy shorthand as I convert my hand scribbles into a post) Was the first part of the equation supposed to condense to N*m as well?

Am I making a math error or am I missing something more important here?

Sean
 
If you follow a consistent system of units, then there is no need to worry about the unit of K -- both sides will ultimately give you the dimension of energy. Just find the values, after converting everything to same units like kg, m ,s.

You have done some math error. I am getting that K has unit of Nm^(11/5). On the RHS inside the bracket it is v2^(-2/5). After multiplying by K, the unit is simply Nm. Both sides should have units of N*m, since that is the unit of energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K