Potential energy of a system of three charges.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential energy of a system of three point charges placed on the x-axis. The user initially struggles with the conceptual understanding and application of the relevant equations, particularly the integration of electric fields and the correct formulation of potential energy between charges. Corrections are made regarding the integration process and the signs in the equations, leading to a clearer understanding of the potential energy formula U = k(q1q2)/r. Ultimately, the user recalculates the potential energy using the correct approach, indicating progress in solving the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying physics principles to solve electrostatic problems.
MSZShadow
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge q1 = 4.10 nC is placed at the origin, and a second point charge q2 = -2.95 nC is placed on the x-axis at x =+ 20.0 cm. A third point charge q3 = 2.00 nC is to be placed on the x-axis between q1 and q2. (Take as zero the potential energy of the three charges when they are infinitely far apart.)

What is the potential energy of the system of the three charges if q3 is placed at x = + 11.0 cm?

Where should q3 be placed between q1 and q2 to make the potential energy of the system equal to zero?

Homework Equations


V_a-V_b = \int^b_aFdr
U=qV
k=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking the problem I'm having at the moment is conceptual. I can't find an example of such a problem in the textbook, and haven't quite wrapped my mind completely around the subject...

Anyway, here's what I tried.
V-0=\int^\infty_xFdr=\int^\infty_xk\frac{q}{r^2}dr=kq(-\frac{1}{r})^\infty_x=kq(-\frac{1}{x})=-k\frac{q}{x}

I used the result from that as follows:
V_1=-k\frac{q}{x}=-k\frac{4*10^{-9}\ C}{1.1*10^{-1}\ m}=-326.9747\ V
V_2=-k\frac{q}{x}=-k\frac{-2.95*10^{-9}\ C}{9*10^{-2}\ m}=294.731\ V
(V_1+V_2)q_3=-6.44874*10^{-8}\ J

Naturally this is wrong. To make it easier to read, I attempted to find the potential between q1 and q3, as well as q2 and q3.
Do I just need to add in a calculation for the potential between q1 and q2? Or, is there something else I need to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you need to take into account the potential energy between q1 and q2 as well.

Your equations are a bit odd. First, you should haveV_a - V_b = -\int_b^a \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{r}You used the letter F, which suggests you're integrating a force, but the potential difference is the integral of the electric field E.

Second, when you integrated, you got the sign wrong. You had V = \int_x^\infty \frac{kq}{r^2}\,drIf q>0, the integrand is positive, and you're integrating from some finite distance x out to infinity so dr>0 as well. The answer should be positive, but you ended up with a negative result.

If you fix that error, you find that the potential energy between two charges q1 and q2 separated by a distance r is U=\frac{kq_1q_2}{r}which is probably one of the formulas in your textbook.
 
Last edited:
Ah. I had written that equation wrong in the problem statement/etc. Lovely. It looks like I had calculated it by integrating E, as opposed to F anyway.

And, I see where my sign went wrong. Products of a tired mind...

Thank you for clearing that up. :)

Edit: My textbook says that the potential energy between two charges q1 and q2 separated by a distance r is...
U=\frac{kq_1q_2}{r} which makes sense, since V=\frac{kq_1}{r} seems to be what I should have calculated in the problem.
Is this what you meant?

My new calculations are using
U=\frac{kq_iq_j}{r_{ij}}
Which I utilized as follows:
U=k\sum_{i<j}\frac{q_iq_j}{r_{ij}}
Which becomes:
U=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}(\frac{4.1*10^{-9}\ C*-2.95*10^{-9}\ C}{0.2\ m}+\frac{4.1*10^{-9}\ C*2*10^{-9}\ C}{0.11\ m}+\frac{-2.95*10^{-9}\ C*2*10^{-9}}{0.09\ m})=498.636441\ J
Which is apparently wrong...
 
Last edited:
Nevermind. I had the figures right, but somehow calculated it wrong.
The problem has been solved now. :)
 
MSZShadow said:
Edit: My textbook says that the potential energy between two charges q1 and q2 separated by a distance r is...
U=\frac{kq_1q_2}{r} which makes sense, since V=\frac{kq_1}{r} seems to be what I should have calculated in the problem.
Is this what you meant?
Yes, sorry. It should be r, not r2. I fixed my earlier post.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top