Potential Energy Questions - I'm lost, help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving two physics problems involving potential and kinetic energy. For the motorcycle daredevil, the conservation of mechanical energy principle is applied, where the total energy at the ramp's exit equals the total energy at the peak height. The relevant formulas include gravitational potential energy (PE = mgh) and kinetic energy (KE = 1/2 mv²). In the second problem with three masses, the same conservation of energy principle applies, emphasizing that the change in kinetic energy plus the change in potential energy equals zero. The key takeaway is that energy conservation simplifies the analysis of both scenarios, eliminating the need for vector components.
kfink85
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. A daredevil on a motorcycle leaves the end of a ramp with a speed of 35 m/s. If his speed is 33 m/s when he reaches the peak of the path, what is the maximum height that he reaches? Ignore friction and air resistance.

I don't know how to approach this problem or set it up? Do I use vectors?


2. Three objects with masses m1 = 5.0 kg, m2 = 10 kg, and m3 = 15 kg, respectively, are attached by strings over frictionless pulleys. The horizontal surface is frictionless and the system is released from rest. Using energy concepts, find the speed of m3 after it moves down a distance of 4.0 m.

There is a diagram showing m2 in the middle of the table and m1 & m3 hanging off of opposite ends.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. When he leaves the ramp he has KE only at the peak of his motion he has KE and PE. The total energy must remain constant.
 
What about the vectors? Do I set this up with X and Y components? I understand and agree with what you said but I'm lost.
 
Potential Energies are scalars (single numbers), not vectors.
You have to know the functional forms ("formulas"), but no component work.
(Most of us prefer Energy approaches, because they're MUCH easier to use!)

gravitational PE formula is m g h , so you need a vertical coordinate.
... KE formula is (1/2) m v^2
 
1. Since the daredevil is subjected to gravity alone we know that his total mechanical energy will be conserved. That is
E\ =\ K\ +\ U\ =\ constant
or
E_{bottom}\ =\ E_{top}

2. Here we have the conservation of mechanical energy of the system of masses again, since the only force doing work along the line of motion of the masses is gravity. since the masses are connected together they will all move with the same speed. Another way of expressing
E\ =\ K\ +\ U\ =\ constant
is to say that the change in E of the system at two different stages will be zero. That is
E_2\ -\ E_1\ =\ 0
which can be written as
(K_2+U_2)-(K_1+U_1)
which after a little bit of arrangement comes to
\Delta K\ +\ \Delta U\ =\ 0
that is the change in kinetic energy of the system plus the change in potential energy of the system will be zero. Or stated another way, what the system loses in potential energy it gains in kinetic energy or vice versa.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top