Potential inside homogenous sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter llandau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Sphere
AI Thread Summary
To calculate gravitational potential inside a homogeneous sphere of mass m, it is essential to recognize that the gravitational force depends only on the mass closer to the center, as the forces from outer mass cancel out. The sphere's volume is (4/3)πR^3, leading to a density of (3/4)m/(πR^3). The mass below a radius r is given by m(r/R)^3, resulting in a force of -Gm(r/R)^3M/r^2, which simplifies to -Gmr/R^3. Consequently, the gravitational potential energy is expressed as -Gmr^2/(2R^3). This understanding is crucial for generalizing gravitational calculations in non-diametric tunnels through a sphere.
llandau
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How to calculate gravitational potential inside a homogenous sphere of mass m? I am curious because I had to solve the classic problem of the tunnel through Earth and wanted to generalize when the tunnel is not a diameter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gravitational force inside a homogeneous sphere depends only on the mass closer to the center- the force vectors due to mass farther out cancel each other.

If the radius of the sphere is R, then its volume is (4/3)\pi R^3 and the density is (3/4)m/(\pi R^3). That means that the mass of the sphere below radius r is (3/4)m/(\pi R^3)(4/3)\pi r^3= m(r/R)^3. The force on an object of mass M then is -Gm(r/R)^3M/r^2= -Gmr/R^3.

So the force is proportional to r and the potential energy is -Gmr^2/(2R^3).
 
You have been helpful, thanks (I believe you lost an M, but it really doesn't matter).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top