Potential of parallel infinite charged wires

musemonkey
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
1. Two infinitely long wires running parallel to the x-axis carry uniform charge densities +\lambda and -\lambda. Find the potential at any point. Show that the equipotential surfaces are circular cylinders, and locate the axis and radius of the cylinder corresponding to a given potential V_0

2. Homework Equations .

Potential of one wire charge density \lambda I calculated to be :

V_a(b) = \frac{-\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_0} \ln (b/a) where a,b are shortest distances to the wire, and distance a is the reference.

I let the wires be equidistant from the x-axis, denoting the distance d. I put the -\lambda wire at (-d,0) and the +\lambda at (d,0).

The Attempt at a Solution



Setting the reference at the origin, the reference distance for both wires is a = d. Letting r_+, r_- be the distance from a point (x,y) to the positive and negative wires, respectively, the potential at (x,y) is then

V(x,y) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_0}( -\ln(r_+/d) + ln(r_-/d) )
= \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_0}\ln(\frac{r_-}{r_+}).

The distances are

r_+ = \sqrt{(x-d)^2 + y^2}
r_- = \sqrt{(x+d)^2 + y^2}.

So the potential can be written

V(x,y) = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\ln(\frac{(x+d)^2 + y^2}{(x-d)^2 + y^2}).

If so, then the eqn. of a V_0 equipotential surface is

k = \frac{(x+d)^2 + y^2}{(x-d)^2 + y^2}) where k = \exp( \frac{4\pi\epsilon_0 V_0}{\lambda} ).

This simplifies to

x^2 + y^2 + d^2 - 2xd\frac{k+1}{k-1} = 0.

and I don't see how this eqn. could define a cylinder, and moreover, on intuitive grounds, I don't see how a cylinder could possibly be the geometry of the equipotential surfaces. By symmetry, an equipotential cylinder would have to be centered at the origin -- right? -- but that would means that the potential at (d + \varepsilon, 0 ) a bit to the right of the positive wire would be the same as the potential at (-d - \varepsilon, 0 ) a bit to the left of the negative wire!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Strictly speaking, x^2 + y^2 + d^2 - 2xd\frac{k+1}{k-1} = 0 defines a circle, not a cylinder. However, the potential is independent of z, so these circles are the same for a given V_0 all the way along the z-axis, and together this infinite collection of circles (of the same radius and center) define a cylindrical surface.

To see that your equation represents a circle, just "complete the square" in 'x', an you can rewrite your equation into the form (x-a)^2+y^2=R^2 which of course, represents a circle centered at (a,0) with radius R... What do you get for your a and R values?...Clearly, your cylinder is not centered at the origin, but rather runs parallel to the z-axis and is centered at (a,0).
 
Now that you mention it, that was the plain-as-day thing to do. Thanks!
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top