Power at fundamental frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of "power at the fundamental frequency" in the context of a Fourier expansion of a wave signal. The fundamental power is defined as the sum of the squares of the coefficients a1 and b1, while the square error is calculated using a specific formula involving the standard errors of these coefficients. There is confusion regarding how this fundamental power relates to the traditional physics definition of power as work over time. Participants suggest that the term "power" might refer to statistical power, indicating a probability aspect rather than a physical one. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the meaning of power at a specific frequency and its implications in the context of signal processing.
maurom
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
reading an article I've encountered the concept of power at the fundamental frequency, google didn't help me. Could you please give to me any hint about this problem? It is at least one week I'm dealing to understand what the "fundamental power" is!
there is a kind of wave, express as:
Y(t)=a1*sin(omega*t)+b1*cos(omega*t)+a2*sin(2*omega*t)+b2*cos(2*omega*t)+a3*sin(3*omega*t)+b3*cos(3*omega*t)
they say that fundamental power is:
a1^2+b1^2
and the square error of the fundamental power is sqrt(2(SE(a1)^4 + SE(b1)^4))

to me it seems quite strange! The power of wave is the work/time, but I guess that the fundamental power it not related to the work/time meaning.
And anyway, how it can be approximated to the squared amplitudes?
also how the square error of fundamental power becomes the dirty thing I wrote above!

thanks a lot,
Mauro

P.S the article is:
Methods for Diagnosis and Treatment. of Stimulus-Correlated Motion in Generic Brain Activation Studies Using fMRI.
www-bmu.psychiatry.cam.ac.uk/sitewide/publications/journal/bullmore99met.pdf
and the formula I'm talking about is at the beginning of page 42.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like the article is using a Fourier expansion of a signal with period omega. The first pair of terms is the fundamental, and the others are overtones (integer multiples of the fundamental).
 
mathman said:
It looks like the article is using a Fourier expansion of a signal with period omega. The first pair of terms is the fundamental, and the others are overtones (integer multiples of the fundamental).

yes, it seems something derived from a Fourier expansion, but actually the sum of sin and cos are there for other reasons. In fact, is to correct for interpolation errors aligning images: that comes from the work of Bullmore et al. cited just above the formula, and the frequency should be the frequency of the time series. By the way, this is not really important to answer my question, I guess!
I can not get the meaning of "power at a certain frequency", it doens't make any sense to me! Or at least, not in a physics way!
I got a guessing answering to you... maybe the power refers to the statistical power (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_power) or the probability that a false positive doesn't occur!
may be...
 
Think of power at a certain frequency (or frequency interval) as the power you would get passing through a filter that only passes the frequency (or frequency interval) of interest.

Claude.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top