- #1
uzair_ha91
- 92
- 0
I have found a possible mistake in my book...here's the text which contains it,
"Referring to figure, it can be seen that no power is disspated in a pure inductor. In the first quarter of cycle, both V and I are positive so the power is positive, which means that energy is supplied to the inductor. In the second quarter, V is positive but I is negative. Now power is negative which implies that the energy is returned by the inductor..."
(The figure looks "something" like this) ::
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/485/grapha.png
Isn't V negative and I positive in the 2nd quarter according to the figure?
"Referring to figure, it can be seen that no power is disspated in a pure inductor. In the first quarter of cycle, both V and I are positive so the power is positive, which means that energy is supplied to the inductor. In the second quarter, V is positive but I is negative. Now power is negative which implies that the energy is returned by the inductor..."
(The figure looks "something" like this) ::
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/485/grapha.png
Isn't V negative and I positive in the 2nd quarter according to the figure?
Last edited by a moderator: