Power generation through building damping systems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of generating power through damping systems in skyscrapers and large buildings by harnessing wave motion and building movement during storms. The idea proposes using hydraulic systems or gears to convert building oscillations into electrical energy. However, it concludes that while damping systems can reduce building sway, they may not effectively extract significant energy, as their primary function is to prevent energy from entering the structure. A simpler and more efficient alternative suggested is the installation of wind turbines on rooftops.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave energy conversion techniques
  • Knowledge of hydraulic systems and their applications
  • Familiarity with structural engineering principles related to building sway
  • Basic concepts of energy extraction and conversion methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research wave energy conversion systems and their efficiencies
  • Explore hydraulic damping systems and their integration in structural engineering
  • Investigate the design and implementation of wind turbines for urban environments
  • Study the principles of energy dissipation in structural systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers in mechanical, structural, civil, and electrical fields, as well as researchers and developers interested in innovative energy generation methods and building performance optimization.

Colcut
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, first time posting. If this is in the wrong forum, please move it to the correct one. (its a cross mechanical/structural/civil/electrical engineering idea)

I was thinking on the way home Power generation.
In order to generate power, wave motion can be used (such as tidal/wave power sources). Could damping of skyscrapers and other large buildings, be used to generate power.
Since there is a fair amount of energy in building movement, especially during storms.
Could varying amounts of electricity be produced as well as reduce the vibration effects on buildings.

Since the motion is similar on each side of the building, could one be reversed and the other kept as normal, and through a system of gears, create the rotational movement necessary to generate electricity.
Alternatively Hydraulic systems may be used for damping, which can either be used for turbines, or even interconnected to each side of the building and push pistons (or something similar), which could then be in turned used for mechanical motion and hopefully adapted for electrical generation.

If this problem could be solved, and assuming the amounts of energy aren't insignificant, could this be a viable supplementary source of electrical generation, or even non electrical energy usage ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd be surprised if there was a lot of energy in it, but certainly you could generate energy by damping the oscillation of a skyscraper. You should look into the properties of the counterweight systems they use.
 
Last edited:
There is a basic problem with this idea.

Assume the wind force on the building does not depend on the amplitude of the movement of the building. That is not exactly true, but unless the building is unstable (like the Tacoma Bridge for example) it is a good approximation.

The work done on by the wind on the building = force times distance, integrated over time.

Therefore, if you design an effective damper, it doesn't work by taking energy out of the building. It really works by stopping the energy getting into the building in the first place, by reducing the building's displacement.

So, extracting a large amount of energy (to make the device cost effective), and designing an effective damper (to reduce the building sway) are contradictory requirements.

Putting a wind turbine on top of the building would probably be a simpler and much more efficient way to generate energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
8K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
12K