Power of discrete sinusoidal signal?

kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
upload_2015-10-17_15-54-33.png


I am a little confused of the last step.
We can set an upper boundary for any arbitrary large number M, so it seems ok.

do you agree on the last statement?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-10-17_15-45-33.png
    upload_2015-10-17_15-45-33.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 507
  • upload_2015-10-17_15-45-43.png
    upload_2015-10-17_15-45-43.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 531
  • upload_2015-10-17_15-50-57.png
    upload_2015-10-17_15-50-57.png
    19 KB · Views: 499
  • upload_2015-10-17_15-51-43.png
    upload_2015-10-17_15-51-43.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 514
Mathematics news on Phys.org
somehow getting a small picture..
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-10-17_15-57-18.png
    upload_2015-10-17_15-57-18.png
    29.5 KB · Views: 610
  • upload_2015-10-17_15-57-45.png
    upload_2015-10-17_15-57-45.png
    14.8 KB · Views: 518
  • daum_equation_1445122747470.png
    daum_equation_1445122747470.png
    22.5 KB · Views: 511
  • daum_equation_1445122747470.png
    daum_equation_1445122747470.png
    22.5 KB · Views: 521
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top