The discussion centers on the effectiveness of power reading techniques for learning complex physics topics such as fluid dynamics, mechanics, and aerospace. Participants unanimously agree that power reading is not suitable for mastering physics due to the necessity of deep understanding and problem-solving skills. The consensus emphasizes that reading comprehension in physics requires engagement with the material, including exercises and derivations, rather than mere speed. Suggestions include focusing on concise syllabi and utilizing resources like the Feynman Lectures for foundational understanding.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, educators, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of complex scientific concepts through effective reading and study strategies.
physicsponderer said:
John Mcrain said:
weirdoguy said:
"IQ" is a big misunderstanding.John Mcrain said:
For me high school physics was a breeze for the most part (some or the math was a slight problem), while high school math was a nightmare. I remember looking at a model answer of applied math and understanding easily how the initial equations were created by resolving the diagram horizontally and vertically, and being able to see that the simultaneous equations were solved for the solution, but not being able to see how the solver had been able to see how to solve those simultaneous equations. When I showed it to a friend, he said, it's just a matter of getting better through experience. It's the same now. It's as if math is the only major school subject I find difficult. When I think mathematically I become error-prone and generally stupid.weirdoguy said:
Your experience is what you say it is. We cannot argue much against it. You needed to get better at basic arithmetic and basic algebra. My guess is those are what are standing in your way.physicsponderer said:
