Power, Resistance, Voltage, Current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculations of power, current, and resistance in a tungsten filament lamp. It highlights the discrepancy between two scenarios: one where a lamp with a resistance of 0.32 ohms operates at 220V, yielding an unrealistic power of 151250W, and another where a 100W lamp with the same resistance results in a more plausible current of 17.6A. The key point is that the two problems are fundamentally different due to the varying voltage and power conditions. When the resistance is adjusted to 484 ohms, both scenarios yield consistent results, demonstrating the importance of using realistic values. The discussion also notes that filament resistance changes with temperature, affecting calculations.
skepticwulf
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have a tungsten filament lamp with a resistance 0,32 ohm
If it operates on 220V line, its power is P=V^2/R=151250W !
However, If the problem is given like , "you have a 100W with resistance 0,32 ohm what's the current? that'd come up as
I=Sqroot(P/R)=17,6A
First result doesn't make sense, or doesn't look "realistic" but the second one does. But they both stem from the same formula: P=IV
Why does it seem to me that these two formulas does not reconcile with each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They arent the same problems. In A you give both the voltage and resistance, finding the power. But in B you give the power and then find the current. The only variable the same between the two is the resistance. The voltage, current, and power are wildly different. Use the same values for all your variables and you'll find that the formulas work great.
 
+1 to what Drakkith said. They aren't the same problem. The data in the first implies something more like a searchlight than a regular light bulb.

Suppose I rewrite your OP so they are the same and more realistic...

I have a tungsten filament lamp with a resistance 484 ohms
If it operates on 220V line, its power is P=V^2/R=100W.

If the problem is given like, "you have a 100W with resistance 484 ohm what's the current? that'd come up as
I=Sqroot(P/R)= 0.454 A.

As a check... P = I*V = 0.454 * 220 = 100W

All consistent now.

Aside: If you are tempted to measure the resistance of a filament be aware that it changes with temperature. The resistance when the filament is cold will be somewhat different to when it's glowing white hot. The calculations above assume the hot value for the resistance.
 
Thank you but in my textbook's example the resistance of a tungsten lamb was given as 0.32 ohm.
Maybe that confused me and maybe I should have taken it like this: "For the resistance value of 0.32 ohm on a 220V line you will get a maximum power of 151250W.
But if you connect a 100W lamp to the line with 0.32 ohm resistance you will get 17.6A of current". That's the notion of being two problems "different" Am I correct?
 
Last edited:
In the second case the voltage is not 220 V but around 5.5 V. The two situations are different, even though the lamp may be the same.
 
Thank you :)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top