Power set (set theory) question

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I'm reading a book about set theory and it introduced the concept of power set. Ok, I understand what is a power set and the entire concept but I have a question about the number of elements of a power set.

There's written in the book that the number of elements of a power set is 2n where n is the number of elements of set that power set is of (very bad english, sorry). For example:

A = {1; 2; 3}

2A = {A; {1;2}; {1;3}; {2;3}; {1}; {2}; {3}; {null set}}

n(2A) = 2n(A) = 23 = 8

Using the concept of Pascal triangle we have the 2n expression comes from:

8910d5b9c8f59852ed8b0cd9ab12ed51.png


But I don't understand how can I manage this equation (before the "= 2n") to it be equals 2n

I would be grateful if someone help me...

Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that

<br /> (a+b)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n C^n_k a^kb^{n-k}<br />

(Binomial Theorem}

Set a = b = 1; then

<br /> (1+1)^n = 2^n = \sum_{k=0}^n C^n_k 1^k 1^{n-k} = C^n_0 + \dots + C^n_n<br />
 
Thank you very much statdad for reply, you helped me alot.
 
One can also prove that the power set of a set with n elements has 2n elements by induction.

The empty set, with 0 elements, has 1 subset, itself. 20= 1.

Induction hypothesis: assume that, for some k, a set containing k elements has 2k[/k] subsets.

Let X be a set containing k+ 1 elements. Select one of the elements (which we can do- k+1> 0) and call it "a". All subsets of X are of two kinds, those that contain a and those that don't. Subsets of X that do not contain a are exactly the subsets of X- {a} which has k+1-1= k elements so there are 2k such subsets. Subsets of X that contain a can be written \left{a\right}\cup U where U is now a subset of X that does not contain a. And, as above, there are 2k such subsets. Thus there are 2k+ 2k= 2(2k)= 2k+1[/sub] subsets of X.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
57
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top