Power waste (conceptual doubt)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculation of power waste in electrical transmission lines, specifically using the formulas for wasted power derived from Ohm's Law. The correct approach involves calculating the current first, using the formula P = V * I, and then applying R * I^2 to find wasted power. The example provided illustrates a scenario with a 1 GW power transmission at 500 kV over 400 km, resulting in a calculated wasted power of 0.12 GW due to the resistance of the aluminum cables. The importance of using the correct voltage drop across the cable resistance, rather than the voltage at the source or destination, is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and its applications
  • Familiarity with power calculations in electrical circuits
  • Knowledge of resistance calculations for transmission lines
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Joule heating formula, P = R * I^2
  • Learn about voltage drop calculations in transmission lines
  • Explore Kirchhoff's voltage law and its implications in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the properties of different conductor materials, such as aluminum and copper, in power transmission
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, professionals involved in power transmission design, and anyone interested in understanding power loss in electrical systems.

Celso
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
I'm currently in a undergrad level course of eletromagnetism and my professor found it useful to remember quickly of some relationships that we see in high scool, among them power waste.
I got the formulas, since they're simple and are direct derivated from the definitions of electric current and ohms law.
wasted power = R i^2 or wasted power = V^2 / R
The thing is that the examples in my textbook always give the total power, the tension and the resistance. For some reason, when I plug V^2/R (which are already given), my answer is incorrect, instead I must first find the current then plug it into R i^2. I feel I'm missing something obvius here, I'll let an exercise from the book.

A transmission line carries a power of 1 GW of a plant, in the voltage of 500kV, to a distance of 400 km. If the cables are made of aluminum and have a diameter of 3 cm, what energy is lost in the cables by the joule effect?

Solution:
1- For simplicity, we will consider the situation where two cables transfer power by direct current. In the round trip, we have 800 km of cable. its resistance is R = pL / (pi (D ^ 2/4)). Pluging the values, we find 30 ohms.

2- The current that travels along the transmission line is given by P = Vi : i = P/V = 2000 A

3- Therefore, the wasted power in heat in the cables is P = R i ^2 = 30 * (2 * 10^3) ^2 = 0.12 GWIn the step 2, why is it wrong to do P = V^2 / R, which would give (5*10^5)^2 / 30, more or less 8.3 GW
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WHERE you measure the voltage matters. There are three different voltages in this problem.

The voltage you need to use is the voltage lost in the resistance of the cable not the voltage at the ends...

The voltage at the power station can be used to calculate the power generated (500kV)
The voltage at the destination city can be used to calculate the power that actually arrives.

The voltage difference between the ends is the voltage lost in the cable and is used to calculate the power lost as heat in the cable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Celso
As an exercise calculate:

a) the voltage at the destination.
b) the voltage drop down the cable.
c) add up the answer to a and b. Should be 500kV.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Celso
Okay, so the current will remain constant in any of these situations
Since the energy drop was 0.12 GW and the current is 2000 A, the voltage drop is 0.12 * 10 ^9 / 2 * 10 ^3 = 0.6 MV
The voltage at the destination will be found through the total energy that made its way to the city (1GW - 0.12GW = 0.88GW), V = 0.88 * 10^9 / 2*10^3 = 4.4 MV

(4.4 + 0.6)MV = 5MV, as expected, thanks :)
 
All looks good. Kirchoff's voltage law proven again :-)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zaya Bell

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
994
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K