How Can I Graphically Represent Powers Higher Than Third?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scientifico
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Graphically representing powers higher than three can be challenging, as traditional visualization methods like surfaces and volumes become inadequate. Topology explores higher-dimensional spaces, which can be complex and unconventional compared to familiar rectangular spaces. Notable figures like Charles Howard Hinton have attempted to visualize four-dimensional space through colored cubes, although precise methods remain elusive. Additionally, resources such as topology books and concepts like "wild topology" may provide insights into these higher dimensions. Ultimately, understanding higher powers often relies more on algebraic behavior than on visual representation.
scientifico
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Hello, I can graphically image square power as a surface and third power as volume but how can I image powers higher than third ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Topology routinely considers spaces of dimension higher than three and some of those are much stranger than the "nice rectangular" spaces you might ordinarily think of. You might look at a few topology books and see if you can find one that meets your needs, but topology covers lots of other things and you might have difficulty finding just what you want.

Steenrod, if I haven't gotten him confused with another name, wrote a book in the last twenty years that specifically described one method of visualizing 4 space. Unfortunately my copy is buried so deep that I'll likely never find it again.

Charles Howard Hinton was an individual about a century or a bit more ago who wrote several books on the fourth dimension.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_howard_hinton

Dover I think published a chopped up version of parts of this about 40 years ago, but some university libraries might have reprints of Hinton's originals. He had what was claimed to be an astonishing memory. In his book he described a set of colored cubes where the colors showed how the faces would be glued together to create a 4D solid if we just had 4 space to work in. It was claimed that if you just worked hard enough, and perhaps had good enough memory, that after a while you would begin to be able to "see" 4 space, either that or you just learned how to quickly correctly answer questions about 4 space as if you could see it. Unfortunately I have never been able to find a precise description of the coloring of the cubes or the complete original instructions so it would be possible to try this. Rudy Rucker in one of his books claims to have been able to reproduce a set of the cubes and followed the instructions, but I do not remember the outcome.

There is a whole field called "wild topology" that is far outside what I expect you are starting with, but lens space is much tamer than that and can give you a peek into the simpler spaces that topology studies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_space
 
scientifico said:
Hello, I can graphically image square power as a surface and third power as volume but how can I image powers higher than third ?

You don't; you just know that they behave a certain way, algebraically speaking.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top