Medical Precentral Gyrus Stimulation and Voluntary movement

  • Thread starter Thread starter ragarth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movement
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the precentral gyrus and its role in motor control, specifically regarding a statement from The Encyclopaedia Britannica Guide to the Brain about electrical stimulation producing movements perceived as voluntary by conscious patients. The inquiry seeks to clarify whether patients genuinely interpret these movements as voluntary or if they view them as reflexive, akin to involuntary reactions. There is skepticism about the accuracy of the book's claims, with previous statements found to be misleading. The conversation highlights the importance of experimental context in shaping patient perception of movements and suggests that further verification of the claims is necessary. Overall, the reliability of the source material is questioned, prompting a search for corroborating evidence from established experiments.
ragarth
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hiya, I'm currently reading The Encyclopaedia Britannica Guide to the Brain and I came across a statement about the precentral gyrus that I'd like to find corroboration for:

"When parts of the gyrus are electrically stimulated in conscious patients (under local anaesthesia), they produce localized movements on the opposite side of the body that are interpreted by the patient as voluntary"

When I read this, it makes me think that, if asked, the patient would state they are consciously making the movement generated by the electrical stimulus. Is this correct, and does anyone know of an experiment where this has been verified?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The case where I've seen the experiment performed (it was a popular science quiz t.v. show) the subjects did not think it was voluntary, but more like a reflex such as when you get hit by a hammer on the knee (but I can imagine that the circumstances in which the experiment is performed can greatly influence the experience of the subject).
 
Humm, how should I interpret that statement then? I'm rapidly losing trust in this book, this would make the 2nd statement in under 30 pages that is either factually false or stupendously misleading.
 
You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your post.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
27K
Back
Top