Predicting Everything with Hypothetical Scanner

  • Thread starter Thread starter josh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A hypothetical scanner capable of detecting atomic and subatomic particles could theoretically predict future events by analyzing all matter within a defined area. However, the discussion highlights the limitations imposed by Quantum Mechanics, particularly the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which states that precise measurements of a particle's position and momentum cannot be made simultaneously. This principle suggests that knowing one aspect reduces certainty about the other, complicating predictions. Additionally, once a measurement is made, the wavefunction collapses, making future predictions probabilistic rather than deterministic. Ultimately, the idea of a fully predictive scanner is challenged by the inherent uncertainties of quantum behavior.
josh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If hypotheticaly speaking you bult a scaner that could scan an enclosed and secure are and the scaner could scan everything down to the smallest atom couldn't it predict exactoly what will happen and when the reason
I am posting it here is because the scaner would have to be able to detect the Gaonoes I think they are called that are in the atoms and there are even smaller and exetera but if you could and then expand the area the scan could do to citys states countrys planets you could predict everything and everything that will happen and when it could tell tou when the universe started and ends and everything else like how black wholes work with all the info it would have gathered
I think that it sucks everytrhing around it into a submicroscopic level and once all the black wholes combine and there is nothing left to suck in all the super condesed matter would all chemicaly react in one blast thus my BIG BANG THiery

hope you have some interesting things to say by the way I am 15 yeaaaay
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gee, that sure is a long sentence. You might consider a period here and there...

Well, Isaac Newton believed in a 'clock-work' universe which is deterministic. He believed that it was possible to know the future of the universe if one knew the position and the velocity of everything in the universe. He wasn't aware of the implications of Quantum Mechanics, however.

A fundamental principle of QM is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Basically, this states that the position and momentum of a particle cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrarily high precision.

According to this principle, the more you know about a particles momentum and velocity, the less you can know about where it is.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
 
Also one of the other fundamental aspects of Quantum Mechanics is once an isolated system has been measured by someone, the wavefunction describing all the states collapses to that corresponding to the state that has been measured. A short time after this the wavefunction is then restored to its earlier format making any predictions of properties later on mere probabilities of all possible outcomes. Thus, the original measurement becomes obsolete for the purpose of predicting future properties.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top