Schools Preparing for Physics C: Calculus or No?

AI Thread Summary
Taking Physics C without prior calculus knowledge may put a student at a disadvantage, as the course is calculus-based. While it is possible to manage with algebraic techniques, understanding calculus concepts can significantly enhance problem-solving abilities, especially for more complex topics. If Physics C is the first physics course, calculus is helpful but not strictly necessary. However, for students who have already taken two physics classes by their junior year, calculus becomes increasingly important. To bridge the gap in knowledge, utilizing resources like Khan Academy or the book "No Bullshit Guide to Math and Physics" by Ivan Savov can provide essential calculus understanding and its application in physics.
Josh0768
Messages
53
Reaction score
6
If I take physics C next year (I am a junior in high school), will I be at a disadvantage if I have not taken calculus yet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was a junior in my first physics course in high school, and did not have calculus until my senior year, where I had a second chem/physics course. In one case in the physics course in my junior year, I remember solving the minimum of a parabolic function by simply using algebraic techniques, where calculus would have offered a solution by setting the derivative of the function equal to zero. If Physics C is the first physics course, calculus can be helpful but isn't necessary. If "C" stands for physics course 3, by then, calculus is very beneficial, but I'd be surprised if a high school has already given you two physics classes by your junior year.
 
Physics C is a calculus based physics course so you would be in a disadvantage, but you could use sources such as khan academy or other websites or books to learn calculus. I highly recommend reading the book- No bullshit guide to math and physics by Ivan Savov, this book goes over the essentials of calculus and goes over it with physics examples.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top