Pressure gain from water dropped from a height

AI Thread Summary
Dropping water from a height into a steel box raises questions about pressure equivalence to ocean depths. The pressure at the bottom of a water column is determined by its height, as explained by Bernoulli's equation, which relates potential energy to pressure. If water is poured from a hose into a one cubic meter container, the pressure will differ from that experienced 20 meters underwater due to the hose's smaller cross-sectional area. However, if a larger water tank is suspended 20 meters above the box and connected by an airtight hose, the pressure in the box would match that of being 20 meters under the sea. Thus, the pressure in the box is contingent on the water source and its height.
nfneilfrancis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
if an unlimited source of water was dropped twenty meters directly downwards into a meter cubed steel box through a hose, would there be the same psi in the box as there would be twenty meters under the sea?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

The question doesn't make all that much sense - the box is a cube, not a square, right? So what is the depth? 1m?

Anyway...the pressure at the bottom (directly under) of a column of water is equal to the pressure due to the height. This is a manifestation of pressure conversion in Bernoulli's equation: potential energy due to height converted to velocity, then velocity pressure converted to static pressure on impact.

But that means if you pour water from a garden hose into a 1 meter cubed container 20m below, the pressure will not be the same as 20m under the ocean because the garden hose is much smaller than 1 square meter in cross sectional area (and the water column, much smaller than that).
 
thanks very much for the help, but it is difficult to describe my question without a diagram... if for example a water-tank containing 50 square meters of water was suspended 20m vertically over a one cubed meter box and they were connected by an airtight hose... would the box have the same psi as there would be 20m under the sea, or would the pressure depend on the water in the water-tank?
 
Last edited:
In your second case, the pressure would be equal to being 20m under the ocean.
 
thanks very much!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top