Pressure in Liquids: Why It's Shape-Independent

  • Thread starter Thread starter Behrooz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Pressure in liquids is determined by the weight of the liquid above the measurement point, making it independent of the container's shape. This principle means that regardless of the container's design, the pressure at a specific depth remains constant. However, changes in volume can affect pressure, as they alter the amount of liquid above the measurement point. The relationship between pressure and depth is crucial for understanding fluid mechanics. Thus, while shape does not influence pressure, volume changes do have an impact.
Behrooz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hi,
why is the presure in liquids not dependant to the shape of its container?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pressure is equal to the weight of the water above the point where it is being measured (divided by unit area), so shape couldn't make any difference.
 
russ_watters said:
Pressure is equal to the weight of the water above the point where it is being measured (divided by unit area), so shape couldn't make any difference.
but when the valum changes,the pressure will change.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top