Pressure of liquid given radius, help please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the pressure at a radius r within a spinning test tube filled with water in an ultracentrifuge. The formula for pressure is given as p = 0.5(p)(angular velocity)^2(r^2 - r(o)^2), where p represents the water's density. Participants are encouraged to ignore gravity and atmospheric pressure while considering centripetal acceleration. To find the pressure at any depth, an integral approach is suggested, requiring the net force on an infinitesimal slice of fluid to be established. Clarification is sought on the specifics of setting up the integral for this calculation.
harlow_barton
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A test tube filled with water is being spun around in an ultracentrifuge with angular velocity. The test tube is lying along a radius and the free surface of the water is at radius r(o).

Show that the pressure at radius r within the test tube is:

p = .5(p)(angular velocity)^2(r^(2) -r(o)^2)

where p is the density of the water. Ignore gravity and atmospheric pressure.


p = p - g(density)(height)


gravity or centripetal acceleration, a= r(angular velocity)^2

height or depth of water, h = r- r(o)

this only gets me to p= p + density*r*angular velocity^2(r-r(0))

I'm not sure where the rest comes from!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At any depth 'below' the surface, the pressure has to provide enough force to accelerate all the fluid 'above' it. Hint: Set up an integral.
 
Doc Al, I'm not sure I understand what I should be taking the integral of. Could you explain further?
 
harlow_barton said:
Doc Al, I'm not sure I understand what I should be taking the integral of. Could you explain further?
Write an expression for the net force on an infinitesimal slice (thickness dr) of the fluid in the tube; then integrate from r(0) to r to find the total force, and then the pressure, at any point along the tube.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top