Pressure required to lift a weight

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benb4ll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift Pressure Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pressure required to lift a weight using a hydraulic setup involving a cylinder filled with water and a buoyant weight. Participants explore the effects of buoyancy on pressure, calculations for pressure differences, and the implications of elevating water tanks on pressure requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a buoyant weight increases the pressure at the bottom of the tank and seeks to understand the pressure difference with and without the weight.
  • Another participant explains that the pressure at a depth in water is determined by the weight of the water column above it, suggesting that the buoyant weight does increase the pressure by displacing water and raising the water level.
  • There is a calculation presented for pressure based on the volume of water and the weight of the buoyant object, leading to confusion over differing results from different approaches.
  • A participant provides a formula for calculating the cross-sectional area and volume of water, emphasizing the need to double-check calculations.
  • Further calculations are presented regarding the weight of water in the tank and the pressure needed to lift the weight through a U-bend pipe, with questions about how to account for the pressure in the U-bend and the effect of elevating the feed tank on pressure requirements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of the buoyant weight on pressure and the calculations involved, leading to confusion and no clear consensus on the correct approach or results.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations and assumptions may be missing or unclear, particularly regarding the effects of the U-bend and the elevation of the feed tank on pressure. The discussion includes various interpretations of pressure calculations and their dependencies on specific parameters.

benb4ll
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Assume all dims in millimeters and kilos and I am working on a hydraulic set up
I have a cylinder Ø200mm diameter x 400 high, it has a hole in the middle Ø10mm going into a capped Ø10mm pipe. The cylinder is filled with water up to 300mm high. There is a buoyant weight that floats on top of the water that weighs 10Kg.

Q1. Firstly, does this buoyant weight increase the pressure at the bottom of the tank (at the Ø10mm cap)? If so, what is the pressure difference if the weight was not there? Or because thre weight floats on top, is the pressure difference negligible?

Q2. If the water was emptied out what pressure/weight/volume of water would be needed in order to fill the cylinder back up with the 10KG weight sitting over the Ø10mm pipe? Assuming that water cannot pass around the weight. ALso, if the tank of water that is being used to fill the cylinder was elevated, would this help in using a smaller tank so the pressure increases?

Any help appreciated. Its been many many moons since I did any physics, hydraulics calculations...

TIA

Ben
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1.-

At any given point inside the water at a depth d, the pressure is simply the weight of the column of water at that point, so, if you take gravity, the volume of water, consider its density, divide that weight by the cross sectional area at that depth...you end up with pressure p = ρgd, where ρ (rho) is water density, g is gravity and d is the depth you are at.

So, does the 10kg floating object increases the pressure? Yes, because it will sink a bit into the water, displacing a certain amount of water where the object itself is and rising the water level in the tank...take this new 'depth' to the bottom of the tank, and you have a new higher pressure.

Or, take the weight of all the water, add 10 kg, divide that force by the cross-sectional area at the bottom of the tank and that is your new pressure...basically, the bottom of the tank needs to carry the weight of everything on top of it...right?

2.-

Again, force is pressure times area and so, if you need to lift a weight of 10kg through a 10mm diameter pipe...you need to calculate the pressure needed so that when multiplied with that cross sectional area...you get 10 kg.

Yes, rising the tank will increase the pressure available.
 
OK,

So I have worked out a figure for the pressure. (based on the volume of water being 0.003534m3
p = 0.003534m3
therefore P= 0.003534 x 9.81 x 200mm (depth)
therefore P= 6.9337kg/m3

But if i use the other calc taking the weight of water (0.003534) +10Kg / 0.785 (cross sec area of tube @ 10mm) = 12.743Kg/m3

So I am confused to the different results?#?
 
Last edited:
cross -sectional area at the bottom = ∏r2

where r = 100 mm = 0.1 m

volume of water is cross - sectional area times height = ∏ r2 h

where h = 300 mm = 0.3 m

weight of such volume of water is density times volume = ρ x volume

where ρ = 1000 kg / m3

Double check your numbers
 
OK, I have worked out that the weight of the water is 9.426Kg in a tank that holds Ø0.2 of water x 0.3m high.

I have tank 1, Ø10mm pipe on a u bend going into another tank (tank2) at the other end of the u bend.

so how do I work out and include the acting pressure of what is needed in the u bend in order to lift the weight.

so.. the u bend I/D is 10mm it goes down 0.1m, goes to the right 90° 0.3m, goes up 90° 0.1m into the tank2.

I guess the weight required to lift the weight in tank 1 directly must be 10KG + 9.426.

But, how do we include the reacting pressure from the u bend and also is there a formula to work out how much pressure increases when you elevate the feed tank 2?

TIA
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
14K