Pressure rise in a vaccum system gas specific?

AI Thread Summary
Introducing a gas into a closed vacuum system at a constant rate, such as 10 SCCM, will result in a pressure rise that is dependent on the specific gas species. Different gases have varying molecular masses, which affects the pressure increase for the same volume introduced. Consequently, evacuating the system and introducing a different gas at the same flow rate will not guarantee an identical rate of pressure rise. This variation is due to differences in the average absolute momentum of gas particles across different species. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calibrating flow controllers.
Asimonson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I introduce a gas into closed vacuum system at a known rate let's say 10 SCCM there will be a subsequent pressure rise over time. Is that pressure rise gas species dependent. If I evacuate the system and introduce a different gas at 10 SCCM should I see the same rate of pressure rise?

Im trying to calibrate some flow controllers with respect to each other and I want to be sure my basic understanding is correct.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you will not necessarily see the same pressure rise. A given volume of a gas "A" does not necessarily cause the same increase in pressure as another volume of gas "B". This is because the average molecular mass of each gas species are different. This means that the average absolute momentum (ignoring vector direction) of the particles is different for a given volume and temperature across various species.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top