Primality Testing: Solve Problem with Incongruency of xj^(n-1)/pj Modulo n

  • Thread starter Thread starter buzzmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a mathematical problem regarding the primality of a positive integer n based on its prime-power factorization. The key conclusion is that if for each prime factor pj of n-1, there exists an integer xj such that (xj)^(n-1)/(pj) is incongruent to 1 modulo n, and (xj)^(n-1) is congruent to 1 modulo n, then n must be prime. The contradiction arises when assuming ordn(xj) is not equal to n-1, leading to the conclusion that ordn(xj) must equal n-1, confirming n's primality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime-power factorization
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic
  • Knowledge of Euler's totient function, Φ(n)
  • Concept of order of an integer modulo n
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Euler's totient function, Φ(n), in relation to prime factors
  • Explore modular arithmetic techniques for proving primality
  • Investigate the concept of order of an integer in group theory
  • Learn about primality testing algorithms and their mathematical foundations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students studying advanced topics in number theory and primality testing.

buzzmath
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with this problem

Let n be a positive integer. Show that if the prime-power factorization of n-1 is n-1=(p1)^(a1)*(p2)^(a2)*...*(pt)^(at) , and for j=1,2,...,t, there exists an integer xj such that
(xj)^(n-1)/(pj) is incongruent to 1(modn)
and
(xj)^(n-1)≡1(modn)
then n is prime
when I write (pt),(xj)... I mean p sub t and x sub j

so far I have
we know ordn(xj)|(n-1)
suppose ordn(xj)≠n-1 then there exists and integer k s.t. n-1=kordn(xj) and we know k>1
(xj)^(n-1)\(pj)=(xj)^((kordn(xj))/(pj))=((xj)^ordn(xj))^(k/(pj))≡1(modp)
this is a condridiction to the original statement
therefore ordn(xj)=n-1 ordn(xj)<=Φ(n)<=n-1
Φ(n)=n-1 and n is prime

the problem I'm encountering is we know (xj)^(n-1)/(pj) is incongruent to 1(modn) but (xj)^(n-1)/(pi) may not be incongruent to 1(modn) for an i≠j
can anyone help me with this problem?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
buzzmath said:
the problem I'm encountering is we know (xj)^(n-1)/(pj) is incongruent to 1(modn) but (xj)^(n-1)/(pi) may not be incongruent to 1(modn) for an i≠j

You can't get around this problem. If n is prime, just take xj to be an element with order pj^aj.

Fortunately though, you don't need to. Just consider the condition for one value of j at a time. What does it tell you about the power of pj that appears in phi(n)?
 
The power of pj that appears in phi(n) is aj. I'm not sure what the exact value of aj is or where you would go from there. Is there a way I could get an answer or a common base by multiplying all of the xj's together to get one base incongruent 1(modn)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K