MHB Prime X 's question at Yahoo Answers (Eigenvalues of AB and BA)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
AI Thread Summary
For n-square matrices A and B, it is proven that the matrices AB and BA share the same eigenvalues. This is demonstrated using block matrices C and D, leading to the conclusion that the determinants of the characteristic polynomials of AB and BA are equal. The proof relies on the property that the determinant of the product of matrices is invariant under the order of multiplication. Consequently, both matrices have the same characteristic polynomial, which implies they possess identical eigenvalues. Additionally, the proof indicates that any common eigenvalue retains the same multiplicity for both matrices.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Prime X,

Suppose $A,B \in\mathbb{F}^{n\times n}$ ($\mathbb{F}$ field) and consider the block matrices $$C=\begin{bmatrix}{\lambda I}&{A}\\{B}&{I}\end{bmatrix}\;,\quad D=\begin{bmatrix}{-I}&{0}\\{B}&{-\lambda I}\end{bmatrix}\quad (I\in\mathbb{F}^{n\times n})$$ Then, $$CD=\begin{bmatrix}{\lambda I}&{A}\\{B}&{I}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}{-I}&{0}\\{B}&{-\lambda I}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}{-\lambda I+AB}&{-\lambda A}\\{0}&{-\lambda I}\end{bmatrix}\\DC=\begin{bmatrix}{-I}&{0}\\{B}&{-\lambda I}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}{\lambda I}&{A}\\{B}&{I}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}{-\lambda I}&{- A}\\{0}&{BA-\lambda I}\end{bmatrix}$$ According to a well-known property $\det(CD)=\det(DC)$ so, $$\det (AB-\lambda I)(-\lambda)^n=(-\lambda)^n\det(BA-\lambda I)$$ Equivalently $$(-\lambda)^n[\det (AB-\lambda I)-\det (BA-\lambda I)]=0$$ But $\mathbb{K}[\lambda]$ is an integral domain so, $$\det (AB-\lambda I)=\det (BA-\lambda I)$$ That is, $AB$ and $BA$ have the same characteristic polynomial (as a consequence the same eigenvalues)

Remark: The above proof also shows that every common eigenvalue has the same multiplicity (with respect to $AB$ and $BA$).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top