Primes whose digits sum to a prime

AI Thread Summary
Prime numbers whose digits sum to a prime are referred to as "additive primes." The discussion highlights the example of the prime number 83, where the sum of its digits (8+3) equals 11, which is also prime. There is curiosity about whether there are infinitely many such primes. The OEIS entry A046704 provides further information on this topic. The concept of additive primes offers a fascinating area for exploration in number theory.
Mooky
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Is there a name for prime numbers whose digits sum to a prime number? For example, the prime 83 gives 8+3=11, a prime. Is there anything known about these primes, e.g. are there infinitely many of them?

Thanks,
M
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
OEIS http://oeis.org/A046704 calls these "additive primes" and Google finds others using this name. Perhaps that is enough to start your quest.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top