Primitive roots and there negatives

  • Thread starter Thread starter talolard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primitive Roots
talolard
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



if p is a prime of the form p=4k+1 and g is a primitive root of p, show that -g is a primitive root.


I'm not sure if this is a decent proof or not. My final argument looks suspicious. Any thoughts?
Thanks
Tal

The Attempt at a Solution




First, notive that \phi(p)=4k. we wish to show that ord_{p}(-g)=4k.

Assume that \left(-g\right)^{d}\equiv1(p) and d\neq4k then d divides 4k.

Assume that d=2a then \left(-g\right)^{2a}=1\cdot g^{2a} implies thatord_{p}(g)=2a a contradiction. Thus d must be odd.

Assume that d is an odd factor of k. then \left(-1g\right)^{d}=-g^{d}\equiv1(p)\iff g^{d}\equiv-1\iff g^{2d}=1 thus ord_{p}(g)=2da contradiction.

Thus ord_{p}(-g)=4k and -g is a primitive root.

Homework Statement


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi talolard! :smile:

That looks like a decent proof to me! You may want to explain why ord_p(g)=2d is a contradiction.
 
Great!
Thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top