Principal Quantum number: n to infinity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the principal quantum number (n) in atomic physics, particularly its potential to extend to infinity and the resulting effects on atomic size and energy levels. Participants explore theoretical aspects of energy levels, ionization energies, and the physical limitations of atomic structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the principal quantum number n can theoretically extend to infinity, leading to the question of whether this implies an infinite number of atomic shells and an infinitely large atom.
  • One participant mentions that in a hydrogen-like atom, the energy of a level is given by E_n = -13.6 eV/n², highlighting that as n increases, the energy required to ionize the atom decreases, suggesting a practical limit to n based on environmental factors.
  • Another participant suggests that while n can be large, the electron's distance from the nucleus increases significantly with large n values, potentially leading to very large atomic sizes, though these states are unstable.
  • There is a discussion about the convergence of energy levels as they approach ionization energies, with some participants questioning why energy levels become closely spaced near these limits.
  • One participant emphasizes that the binding energy is the difference between the initial state and the final state, noting that as n increases, the energy difference between successive levels decreases, which relates to the approach towards ionization energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the implications of n extending to infinity, the nature of energy levels, and the concept of atomic size. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the limits of n or the implications for atomic structure.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the concept of n approaching infinity raises questions about the physical limitations of atomic size and the stability of such states. There are references to the convergence of energy levels and the relationship to ionization energies, but these concepts are not fully resolved.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
I am aware that n is the principal quantum number and determines the energy of a specific energy level of an atom. In my notes, I see that n goes from 1,2,3... which implies to me all the way to infinity. If this is the case, why doesn't this imply that there can be infinitely many shells in an atom and consequently make the atom infinitely big?

I have also read about there being a 'series limit' and know that the atom is about 10^-10m big, so there must be a 'cut off' number of shells somewhere?

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's an interesting question, if the universe was made of but one hydrogen atom, could it have an infinite number of energy levels (at absolute zero)? Well, regardless, in a hydrogen-like atom the energy of a given level goes like E_n=\frac{-13.6 \mathrm{eV}}{n^2}. The key thing being the negative sign. The electron, when in an orbital is in a BOUND STATE (a state whose energy is LESS THAN what it would be if the electron was infinitely far away, or ionized in this case). The amount of energy then needed to "ionize" or strip that electron away is the negative energy value. Thus you can see that as n gets bigger the amount of energy required to remove the electron gets smaller like \propto \frac{1}{n^2}. So consider two things: one, an electron at a non-zero temperature has energy associated with this temperature, and two, no atom is in complete isolation and there are always other forces perturbing this perfect system. Thus, for all intents and purposes there is indeed an effective n_max and thus a maximum radius but I'd imagine what that radius is depends on the temperature and the environment. Hope that helps.
 
CAF123 said:
I am aware that n is the principal quantum number and determines the energy of a specific energy level of an atom. In my notes, I see that n goes from 1,2,3... which implies to me all the way to infinity. If this is the case, why doesn't this imply that there can be infinitely many shells in an atom and consequently make the atom infinitely big?

I have also read about there being a 'series limit' and know that the atom is about 10^-10m big, so there must be a 'cut off' number of shells somewhere?

Many thanks.

Yes, actually there is no reason that I'm aware of for n to be limited above and, should that be true, expectation of the electron's distance from the nucleus rises without limits, with n2 I believe. Consequence is that with n = 1 000 000 you'd have hydrogen atom larger than Earth. Of course, this states are very unstable, good starting point on this topic is wikipedia.

Reason that atom is "10^-10m big" is that electrons dominantly populate ground state.
 
Ah, ok thanks.
Perhaps it is due to the energy levels coming closer and closer together to the first ionisation energy and then subsequently to the second ,third and so on to how many applicable ionisation energies there are for certain atoms. Once we reach the last ionisation energy, the atom exists as an ion, stripped of all electrons. What is the size of an ion?

I don't understand however, 'why the closely spaced levels converge to the first ionisation energy' as Wikipedia puts it. Since as n increases, E decreases since E is proportional to 1/n^2.
 
CAF123 said:
Ah, ok thanks.
Perhaps it is due to the energy levels coming closer and closer together to the first ionisation energy and then subsequently to the second ,third and so on to how many applicable ionisation energies there are for certain atoms. Once we reach the last ionisation energy, the atom exists as an ion, stripped of all electrons. What is the size of an ion?

I don't understand however, 'why the closely spaced levels converge to the first ionisation energy' as Wikipedia puts it. Since as n increases, E decreases since E is proportional to 1/n^2.

The binding energy is an energy DIFFERENCE between the state it starts in and the final state (dissociated or limit of n--> infinity) so as n increases the energy difference between n and n+1 gets smaller and, by definition, as n gets larger you approach the ionization energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K