Principal Virtual Work vs Principal of Minimum Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between the Principal of Virtual Work (PVW) and the Principal of Minimum Potential Energy (PMPE) in structural analysis. PMPE focuses on the actual energies of a system and can be applied even when the system is not in equilibrium or under external forces, exemplified by the shape of a soap bubble minimizing surface area. In contrast, PVW requires the system to be in equilibrium and influenced by external forces, emphasizing the relationship between static equilibrium and geometrical compatibility. The concept of virtual work is used to simplify complex load scenarios by replacing them with a single load to determine displacements. Understanding these principles is crucial for effectively solving structural problems.
Abe21599
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello

Just had a quick question for a structures class. When attempting a problem, what's the main difference between applying PVW and PMPE? What would classify a problem in using one over the other?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK PMPE is the calculation of the actual energies involved when we vary a parameter for a system.
The system need not be in equilibrium.
There need be no external forces acting.

For example the potential energy of a soap bubble depends on its surface area, which in turn depends on its shape, and PMPE says it will take a shape which minimises this.
Looking at shapes we find that as we vary the shape the one with the minimal surface area is a sphere, which is the shape of a soap bubble.

Virtual Work is more difficult conceptually and is not a minimum theorem. In fact the energies (work) calculated have no reality, hence the term.

The system must be in equilibrium.
There must be external forces acting.

Structural VW stems from the fact that in responding to loads any system must satisfy two independent conditions

Static equilibrium of forces (internal and external) acting (set1)
&
Geometrical compatibility of strains or displacements (set2)

Since work is the product of force and distance any such multiplication has the dimensions of work.

So multiplying set 1 by set 2 has the dimensions of work. This is known as the virtual work since either set 1 or 2 may be different from the actual ones applied to the system.

VW is particularly if we wish to calculate a single displacement of a complicated set of loads and replace the set with a single load in the direction of the desired displacement.
 
Thanks for the detailed response. that definitely clears up a lot of things.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top