Probabilities: Estimating the probability of overlapping

jksacc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all
I recently ran into this problem:
I have two bins. Each bin contains N numbered balls, from 1 to N.
For both the bins, the probability of the ball numbered k to be
selected equals to P(ball-k-selected)=k/SUM(1:N) (in other versions
this can be any given probability distribution)

Simple case:
Having selected 1 ball from the first bin, and 1 ball from
the second bin, i want to find the probability of the ball
having the same number.

If i am correct, the probability for this is SUM(k=1:N) (P(ball-k-selected)^2).

Complex case:
Having selected m balls from the first bin, and m balls from
the second bin, i need the probability of holding at least
one pair of balls with the same number at the end of the
experiment.

Assumption: The selection is without replacement. However, for
simplicity we can assume that the probability of a ball to be selected
remains stable during the experiment, and is given by
P(ball-k-selected)=k/SUM(1:N)

If something is not clear, please let me know.

Thanks in advance for any contributions!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Denote integers with lowercase and sets with UPPERCASE. The set of balls in bin i is Ni.

There are C(n, m) = n!/(m!(n-m)!) combinations (subsets) that you can draw from either bin.

Let S1 be a subset of m balls from the 1st bin. Let S2 be the corresponding subset from the 2nd bin. How many subsets of m balls can you form out of the set of the remaining balls in the 2nd bin, S2' = N2\S2? The answer is s2' = |S2'| = C(n-m, m). That's the answer to the question, "for a given S1, how many disjoint subsets of the same size are there?" Since there are C(n,m) ways to construct S1, there are C(n,m)C(n-m,m) ways to construct two disjoint subsets, each with m elements.

Now you need to calculate the probability of obtaining these disjoint subsets.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top