Probability and probability amplitude.

Click For Summary
Quantum superposition allows particles like electrons to take multiple paths simultaneously, with all paths having equal probability but differing probability amplitudes influenced by phase. When measured, the superposition collapses, forcing the particle to adopt a single path, typically reinforcing those close to the classical path while canceling those that stray far. The relationship between probability and probability amplitude is crucial, as the latter can be complex and its square determines the probability. Amplitudes can cancel each other out based on their phases, leading to varied probabilities despite equal amplitudes. Richard Feynman's book "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" is recommended for a more accessible understanding of these concepts.
dawningparadox
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Quoted from reddit, an explanation for quantum superposition :

By analogy, you could say that the traveling electron is in a superposition of paths. Some are direct (close to what is called the "classical path" -- the path that a particle would take according to classical mechanics). Some are indirect, going to the moon and back before arriving at its destination.

But, when you measure the electron, you cause the superposition to collapse, just as before, and the electron is forced to take on a single path.

Now, the crazy thing is, all of the paths have the same probability. The probability is a positive number between 0 and 1 that says how probable it is that a certain path will be chosen. A probability of 0.5 means that the path has a 50% chance of being chosen. The crazy thing I'm saying here, though, is that all of the paths have the same probability, which sounds crazy.

Quantum mechanics has a weird quantity, though, called the probability amplitude. The amplitude is like the square root of the probability. Since it's a square root, it need not be positive, and it doesn't even have to be real. A probability amplitude can be any complex number, as long as the square of its modulus is between 0 and 1.

And it turns out that, even though all of the paths have an equal probability, they do not all have the same probability amplitude. Specifically, they differ by a phase. When you add up the probability amplitudes for each path, you find two things:

a) The paths that are close to the "classical" path tend to re-enforce one another. b) The paths that stray far from the classical path tend to cancel each other out.

So in the end, the probability of finding the particle very far away from the classical path is very small. Small particles like electrons can stray a little bit, but it's not too far before the probability becomes too small. Heavier objects, like a grain of sand, can't stray by any measurable amount before the probability becomes near-zero, which is why those objects seem to behave in a classical way.

Someone pointed out that the one that stays the same within all possible paths should be the probability rather than the probability amplitude. By the relationship of (probability amplitude)² = (probability), if the probability amplitudes are equal within all possible paths, how does the probabilty cancellation mechanism (within similar paths) work? How can equal values cancel each other out and produce different values for their squares (probability)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dawningparadox said:
By the relationship of (probability amplitude)² = (probability), if the probability amplitudes are equal within all possible paths, how does the probabilty cancellation mechanism (within similar paths) work? How can equal values cancel each other out and produce different values for their squares (probability)?
All probability amplitudes are summed (as vectors) and only one final amplitude is then squared. Amplitudes cancel each other out when they have opposite phases.
I can recommend you Richard Feynman's book "QED: The strange theory of light and matter". It's accurate but it describes the the math in an alternative layman friendly way.
 
zonde said:
All probability amplitudes are summed (as vectors) and only one final amplitude is then squared. Amplitudes cancel each other out when they have opposite phases.
I can recommend you Richard Feynman's book "QED: The strange theory of light and matter". It's accurate but it describes the the math in an alternative layman friendly way.
Thanks.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
First, I need to check that I have the 3 notations correct for an inner product in finite vector spaces over a complex field; v* means: given the isomorphism V to V* then: (a) physicists and others: (u,v)=v*u ; linear in the second argument (b) some mathematicians: (u,v)=u*v; linear in the first argument. (c) bra-ket: <v|u>= (u,v) from (a), so v*u . <v|u> is linear in the second argument. If these are correct, then it would seem that <v|u> being linear in the second...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K