Probability: Expected distance of an accelerating car - with a twist

HexNash
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have an expected value probability problem. Unfortunately, I do not know enough about mathematics to determine if it is even remotely feasible to try to solve it. The best way to explain it is to disguise it as a physics problem:

Imagine a race car on a never-ending straight track. Let's call the position it starts at 0 units, and its starting velocity is 0 units per turn. Suppose we generate a random number from 1 to 60. If any number except 60 comes up, its current velocity is increased by 1, and the car is moved forward the number of units corresponding to the new velocity. However, if a 60 is rolled, it crashes: the current velocity is reset to 0, and the car is not moved (as the new velocity is 0u/t).

Now, the initial problem I worked out was how many units, on average, the car will travel before it crashes once. That was fairly easy: because the distance the car travels corresponds to a triangular number [n(n+1)/2], and the probability of the trial ending is always 1/60 each turn, the expected value corresponds to the equation: sum of (n(n+1)/2)(1/60)(59/60)^n from n=0 to n=infinity = 3540

However, I have another problem I am trying to solve that is proving much more difficult:
What is the expected distance of the car after 60 (or in general, n) turns?
In this scenario, when a car crashes, its velocity is reset to 0, but it is still "in the race" for the remaining number of turns.

I have tried all different kinds of techniques to try to figure this out, but to no avail. I'm hoping this isn't too complicated or tedious to compute, but considering there are 966,467 ways to partition 60, all with differing odds of occurring, I'm not too confident. Doing some research, I found that something called a "Markov chain" might help, but I am not familiar with how those work.

Does anyone know how I can tackle this? It is nothing really important, just a thought experiment I was curious about, but it is really bugging me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing you do NOT say is how often this random number is generated. Not knowing long the car moves at a given velocity, you cannot say how far it would go.
 
HallsofIvy said:
One thing you do NOT say is how often this random number is generated. Not knowing long the car moves at a given velocity, you cannot say how far it would go.

It is discrete: each time a number is generated it is a turn, and the velocity is changed and the car is moved forward. For example, given the sequence of generated numbers: 53 04 34 60 23 47, that is 6 turns and the car is moved 1+2+3+0+1+2 = 9 units. What I am trying to figure out is the expected value after 60 turns.
 
Let d_n be the expected distance that the car will travel in a race of duration n. Let T be the last time the car is stopped (so if there is no crash we'll put T = 0). Now we can set up the following recurrence for d_n:
d_n = \sum_{i=0}^n P(T=i)(d_{i-1} + \Delta(n-i))
where \Delta(m) is the mth triangular number, and we assume d_{-1} = d_0 = 0. Now, P(T=i) = (1/60)(59/60)^{n-i}, so this recurrence let's you easily calculate d_n for any n (using a computer, of course).

The explanation of this is simple: if the car crashes for the last time at time i, it traveled an average of d_{i-1} steps in the time between the start of the race and i and travels exactly \Delta(n-i) steps after that time.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top