Probability in a Deck of Cards

  • Thread starter Thread starter TranscendArcu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards Probability
Click For Summary
In a scenario where one black card is removed from a standard deck of 52 cards, participants are tasked with calculating the probability that all 13 dealt cards are red. The initial assumption that the probability is 2/3 is challenged, as calculations yield results closer to 38/1,740,081 or 13/1,740,081, indicating a misunderstanding of the problem. The correct approach involves using the hypergeometric distribution, which accounts for the composition of the remaining cards. Discrepancies arise when different methods are applied, such as multiplying probabilities at each draw versus using combinations. Ultimately, the consensus is that the original claim of a 2/3 probability is incorrect.
TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a deck of 52 cards, one black card is removed. There are then 13 cards dealt. Show that the probability that they are all red is 2/3.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand why I can't calculate the probability as
Screen_shot_2012_04_15_at_4_11_15_PM.png


That is, the the number of red cards when total cards is 51 divided by this total, times the number of red cards, given that one was drawn previously, divided by the new total of 50, etc. etc.

But this value isn't even close to 2/3! Apparently it's more like 13/(1 740 081)

How can I increase my denominator by several hundred thousand to get 2/3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi TranscendArcu! :smile:
TranscendArcu said:
In a deck of 52 cards, one black card is removed. There are then 13 cards dealt. Show that the probability that they are all red is 2/3.

No, that's ludicrous! :rolleyes:

The question must be wrong. :biggrin:
 
TranscendArcu said:

Homework Statement



In a deck of 52 cards, one black card is removed. There are then 13 cards dealt. Show that the probability that they are all red is 2/3.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand why I can't calculate the probability as
Screen_shot_2012_04_15_at_4_11_15_PM.png


That is, the the number of red cards when total cards is 51 divided by this total, times the number of red cards, given that one was drawn previously, divided by the new total of 50, etc. etc.

But this value isn't even close to 2/3! Apparently it's more like 13/(1 740 081)

How can I increase my denominator by several hundred thousand to get 2/3?

I get the answer = 38/1740081 (as compared with your 13/1740081), but I don't get anything like 2/3. Whoever told you the answer is 2/3 is either wrong or is describing a different problem.

This is a simple problem in the hypergeometric distribution. We have a deck of 51 cards, 26 red and 25 black. We want to know the probability of getting 13 red in a sample of size 13; I just used the hypergeometric formula.

RGV
 
When I first did this problem, I calculated C(26,13)/C(51,13). This gives the answer of 38/1740081. I ultimately multiplied out all of the probabilities at each draw because, to me, it seemed more easily visualizable. But I don't know why the two methods should return different results unless there is something fundamentally wrong with the method of multiplying out at each draw.
 
TranscendArcu said:
When I first did this problem, I calculated C(26,13)/C(51,13). This gives the answer of 38/1740081. I ultimately multiplied out all of the probabilities at each draw because, to me, it seemed more easily visualizable. But I don't know why the two methods should return different results unless there is something fundamentally wrong with the method of multiplying out at each draw.

Your product above has 14 factors, not 13.

RGV
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K