Probability in a Deck of Cards

  • Thread starter Thread starter TranscendArcu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a probability problem involving a standard deck of 52 cards, from which one black card is removed. Participants are tasked with determining the probability that all 13 dealt cards are red, with a claim that this probability is 2/3.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the calculation of probability, particularly in relation to the number of red cards and the total number of cards after one black card is removed. Some attempt to use the hypergeometric distribution, while others question the validity of the provided probability of 2/3.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to calculate the probability, with participants noting discrepancies in results. Some suggest that the original problem statement may be incorrect, while others are analyzing their approaches to understand the differences in outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the problem is correctly stated, but there is skepticism about the provided probability of 2/3. The discussion includes references to combinatorial calculations and the hypergeometric distribution.

TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a deck of 52 cards, one black card is removed. There are then 13 cards dealt. Show that the probability that they are all red is 2/3.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand why I can't calculate the probability as
Screen_shot_2012_04_15_at_4_11_15_PM.png


That is, the the number of red cards when total cards is 51 divided by this total, times the number of red cards, given that one was drawn previously, divided by the new total of 50, etc. etc.

But this value isn't even close to 2/3! Apparently it's more like 13/(1 740 081)

How can I increase my denominator by several hundred thousand to get 2/3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi TranscendArcu! :smile:
TranscendArcu said:
In a deck of 52 cards, one black card is removed. There are then 13 cards dealt. Show that the probability that they are all red is 2/3.

No, that's ludicrous! :rolleyes:

The question must be wrong. :biggrin:
 
TranscendArcu said:

Homework Statement



In a deck of 52 cards, one black card is removed. There are then 13 cards dealt. Show that the probability that they are all red is 2/3.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand why I can't calculate the probability as
Screen_shot_2012_04_15_at_4_11_15_PM.png


That is, the the number of red cards when total cards is 51 divided by this total, times the number of red cards, given that one was drawn previously, divided by the new total of 50, etc. etc.

But this value isn't even close to 2/3! Apparently it's more like 13/(1 740 081)

How can I increase my denominator by several hundred thousand to get 2/3?

I get the answer = 38/1740081 (as compared with your 13/1740081), but I don't get anything like 2/3. Whoever told you the answer is 2/3 is either wrong or is describing a different problem.

This is a simple problem in the hypergeometric distribution. We have a deck of 51 cards, 26 red and 25 black. We want to know the probability of getting 13 red in a sample of size 13; I just used the hypergeometric formula.

RGV
 
When I first did this problem, I calculated C(26,13)/C(51,13). This gives the answer of 38/1740081. I ultimately multiplied out all of the probabilities at each draw because, to me, it seemed more easily visualizable. But I don't know why the two methods should return different results unless there is something fundamentally wrong with the method of multiplying out at each draw.
 
TranscendArcu said:
When I first did this problem, I calculated C(26,13)/C(51,13). This gives the answer of 38/1740081. I ultimately multiplied out all of the probabilities at each draw because, to me, it seemed more easily visualizable. But I don't know why the two methods should return different results unless there is something fundamentally wrong with the method of multiplying out at each draw.

Your product above has 14 factors, not 13.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K