MHB Probability of a Percent given a Percent

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of a random voter being brown-haired in a town with specific demographic percentages and voting behaviors. Users highlight the importance of understanding the two different wholes involved: the overall voting population and the voting percentages within each demographic. The initial confusion stems from how to approach the problem without knowing voter turnout for each group. The application of Bayes' theorem is suggested, providing a clear formula to derive the probability based on the given data. Ultimately, the conversation clarifies the necessary steps to solve the probability question effectively.
tizpan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm hoping that I can gain some insight from fellow users in how to start off a probability question when given a percent 'given that' and another percent.

For example, if an election is split into percentages of votes per party and you know the party allegiance percentages of the town, how can you devise the probability that a random townsperson voted a certain way?

There are two different wholes at play: the voting population and the amount of voting percentages within the party. I can't figure out where to start (Doh)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tizpan said:
I'm hoping that I can gain some insight from fellow users in how to start off a probability question when given a percent 'given that' and another percent.

For example, if an election is split into percentages of votes per party and you know the party allegiance percentages of the town, how can you devise the probability that a random townsperson voted a certain way?

There are two different wholes at play: the voting population and the amount of voting percentages within the party. I can't figure out where to start (Doh)

I doubt that you can, first you don't know the turn-out, or the turn-out for each party as these may be different.

Also the basic assumptions on voting behaviour do not seem reasonable.

CB
 
That is where I am getting confused in starting this problem.

The details given are as follows: A certain town is made up of 38.6% brown haired people, 57.1% blondes and 4.3% redheads. In the last town mayor race, votes were cast by 43.1% of the brown haired people, 40.7% blondes, and 51.7% of redheads. If a mayoral race voter is chosen at random, what is the probability that they are a brown haired?

Instinctively, I would look at this as the P(of brown haired in the town) * P(of brown haired that voted). So, .386*.431 equaling .166366. Somehow I can't help but think that there is more that I need to consider.:confused:
 
tizpan said:
That is where I am getting confused in starting this problem.

The details given are as follows: A certain town is made up of 38.6% brown haired people, 57.1% blondes and 4.3% redheads. In the last town mayor race, votes were cast by 43.1% of the brown haired people, 40.7% blondes, and 51.7% of redheads. If a mayoral race voter is chosen at random, what is the probability that they are a brown haired?

Instinctively, I would look at this as the P(of brown haired in the town) * P(of brown haired that voted). So, .386*.431 equaling .166366. Somehow I can't help but think that there is more that I need to consider.:confused:

Bayes' theorem:

\[P(Br|V)=P(V|Br)P(Br)/P(V)\]

\(P(V|Br)=0.431\), \(P(Br)=0.386\),

\( \begin{aligned}P(V)&=P(V|Br)P(Br)+P(V|Bl)P(Bl)+P(V|R)P(R)\\&=0.431 \times 0.386+0.407 \times 0.571 + 0.517 \times 0.043 \approx 0.421 \end{aligned}\)

CB
 
That makes sense now, thank you Captain!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top