Probability of dealing 4 cards from pack of 52 cards

  • Thread starter Thread starter something42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the probability of drawing four cards from a standard deck of 52 cards, specifically focusing on the scenario where all four cards have the same face value.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the probability by adding fractions based on sequential card draws, expressing uncertainty about the validity of their approach. Other participants suggest that multiplication should be used instead of addition for joint probabilities. There is discussion on whether the face value of the cards must be specified before drawing, leading to different probability calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the specification of card values and the correct method for calculating probabilities. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of multiplication for joint probabilities, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the definitions of probability and how they apply to the drawing of cards, as well as the implications of drawing without replacement from a finite set.

something42
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question is:
Four cards are dealt from a well-shuffled pack of 52 cards.
What is the probability that all four cards bear the same face value?

Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


My guess is that first of all, I pick a card out of random, 1/52. Then after that, I have 12 chances of picking the same face value out of 51 cards, so that is 12/52. Then I continue this for the other cards, so I get:

1/52 + 12/51 + 11/50 + 10/49 = 0.68

The thing is, I can't help but think that's a bit high. Have I missed something glaringly obvious, or have I done it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi something42! Welcome to PF! :smile:
something42 said:
The thing is, I can't help but think that's a bit high. Have I missed something glaringly obvious, or have I done it right?

You want the joint probability (of independent events), so you need to multiply, not add. :wink:
 
It depends on whether you specify the value of the card before you start pulling them from the pack.

If you don't specify the card then the odds are 1 * 3/51 *2/50 * 1/49 (the 1 at the start is because you must pull a card from the pack)

If you do specify the value the odds become 4/52 * 3/51 *2/50 *1/49
 


Hey guys! Thanks for taking the time to answer my question!

tiny-tim said:
Hi something42! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Yay! Thanks! :blushing:

tiny-tim said:
You want the joint probability (of independent events), so you need to multiply, not add. :wink:
You know, after I posted this, I knew it was the addition that gave me problems. However, when I saw the results when I multiplied them afterwards, it gave me a shock as to how low the value was, so I didn't think that was appropriate. But wow! That low? :eek:

Thanks for the tip, though! In my moment of hair pulling, it helps to get some confirmation. :D

Jobrag said:
It depends on whether you specify the value of the card before you start pulling them from the pack.

If you don't specify the card then the odds are 1 * 3/51 *2/50 * 1/49 (the 1 at the start is because you must pull a card from the pack)

If you do specify the value the odds become 4/52 * 3/51 *2/50 *1/49

Thanks for taking the time! If you don't mind, I want to "challenge" your post.

First of all, the 1 at the start completely makes sense. I don't know why I didn't think of this sooner. So I guess that answers your question of the card being specified or not (from what I've seen in the question, it doesn't matter).

However, I don't get why you have 3/51, 2/50, 1/49. I always thought the definition of

probability of E = number of sample points in E/total number of sample posts

and considering that, if the card pack gets less and less for a suit (because that's what I'm reading it as), surely we take into account the number of available suits, and not the amount of cards currently needing to be picked?

Sorry about the "challenge", but I really want to get this stats stuff right. It seems so simple, yet if I got it wrong, I'd be constantly slapping my head for the rest of my life :(

But thanks everyone who has posted :D
 
Hi something42! :smile:
something42 said:
First of all, the 1 at the start completely makes sense. I don't know why I didn't think of this sooner. So I guess that answers your question of the card being specified or not (from what I've seen in the question, it doesn't matter).

However, I don't get why you have 3/51, 2/50, 1/49. I always thought the definition of

probability of E = number of sample points in E/total number of sample posts

and considering that, if the card pack gets less and less for a suit (because that's what I'm reading it as), surely we take into account the number of available suits, and not the amount of cards currently needing to be picked?

Sorry about the "challenge", but I really want to get this stats stuff right. It seems so simple, yet if I got it wrong, I'd be constantly slapping my head for the rest of my life :(

But thanks everyone who has posted :D

Jobrag :smile: is right …

your 12, 11, 10 would be for picking the same suit, because there are 12, 11, 10 left.

For the same value, there are 3, 2, 1 left. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K