Probability of rearrangements of letters

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter UniPhysics90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of arranging the letters of the word 'MINIMUM' such that the three M's are together at the beginning of the arrangement. Participants explore different methods for solving this problem, focusing on combinatorial reasoning and the use of factorials in probability calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines two methods for calculating the probability, with Method 1 being a straightforward multiplication of probabilities and Method 2 involving statistical weights and arrangements.
  • Method 2 is explained using the formula w=7!/(3!2!1!1!)=420 to account for indistinguishable letters, leading to a probability of p=12/420=1/35.
  • Another participant suggests a different approach by considering the arrangement of letters as drawing from a bag, emphasizing the need to account for indistinguishable letters in the calculation.
  • There is a discussion about the concept of multinomial coefficients and how they relate to the arrangements of letters, with some participants seeking clarification on why certain divisions are necessary.
  • A participant questions whether having multiple identical letters increases the probability of obtaining a specific arrangement, prompting further explanation about grouping arrangements based on indistinguishable letters.
  • Another participant affirms that the presence of identical letters does not increase the probability of a specific arrangement, as all arrangements can be grouped into sets that share the same positions for identical letters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the methods for calculating the probability but express uncertainty and seek clarification on the implications of indistinguishable letters and the reasoning behind the factorial divisions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the intuitive understanding of how identical letters affect probability.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the arrangements of letters and the nature of indistinguishable items. There are unresolved questions about the impact of identical letters on probability calculations and the interpretation of factorials in this context.

UniPhysics90
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If the letters of the word 'MINIMUM' are arranged in a line at random, what is the probability that the 3 M's are together at the beginning of the arrangement.

There are 2 methods outlined to solve this problem.

Method 1: (3/7)*(2/6)*(1/5)=(1/35) I understand this method completely.

The method I would like clarified is:

Method 2:

The statistical weight, w, w=7!/(3!2!1!1!)=420.
The number of ways of writing 'mmm****' where * is (i,n,u) is 4!/(2!1!1!)=12.
Thus p=12/420=1/35I get that the factorials are used as m is repeated 3 times, and i 2 times. I don't know why we divide by these, as in my mind there are 7! possible ways of arranging the letters, albeit some of them repeats. For probability, why is this used? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
UniPhysics90 said:
If the letters of the word 'MINIMUM' are arranged in a line at random, what is the probability that the 3 M's are together at the beginning of the arrangement.

There are 2 methods outlined to solve this problem.

Method 1: (3/7)*(2/6)*(1/5)=(1/35) I understand this method completely.

The method I would like clarified is:

Method 2:

The statistical weight, w, w=7!/(3!2!1!1!)=420.
The number of ways of writing 'mmm****' where * is (i,n,u) is 4!/(2!1!1!)=12.
Thus p=12/420=1/35


I get that the factorials are used as m is repeated 3 times, and i 2 times. I don't know why we divide by these, as in my mind there are 7! possible ways of arranging the letters, albeit some of them repeats. For probability, why is this used? Thanks

The reason for calculating w is to count the number of possible arrangements of the letters in MINIMUM, all of which we assume to be equally likely. If all the letters were distinct, the number of arrangements would be 7!. But there are duplicates: 3 Ms, 2 Is. So imagine we put tags on the Ms and Is and consider the set [tex]\{M_1, I_1, N, I_2, M_2, U, M_3\}[/tex]. With the tags, there are now 7! arrangements. Now divide by 3! to compensate for the fact that the Ms are actually indistinguishable and divide by 2! to compensate for the fact that the Is as indistinguishable.

Does this make sense to you? It may help to know that the numbers you are calculating are multinomial coefficents: see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinomial_coefficient
 
Here are two slightly different versions of your method 2:

(a) Suppose the letters were written on 7 balls in a bag.
There are 7! possible ways to draw the balls from the bag (but not every way looks different, because there are 3 M's and 2 I's)

The number of ways to draw the 3 Ms, followed by the 4 other letters, is
3! 4!

So the probability is 3! 4! / 7! = 1/35

(b). Now, suppose you are writing the letters in a line.
The number of diifferent ways to write the 7 letters is 7! / 2! 3! (because there are 3 Ms and 2 Is)
The number of different ways to write 3 Ms followed by the other 4 letters is
1 (for the 3 Ms) x 4!/2! (for the other four letters, includng the two I's)

So the probability is
(4!/2!) / (7!/2!3!)
= 2! 3! 4! / 2! 7! = 1/35

Hope that helps.
 
awkward said:
The reason for calculating w is to count the number of possible arrangements of the letters in MINIMUM, all of which we assume to be equally likely. If all the letters were distinct, the number of arrangements would be 7!. But there are duplicates: 3 Ms, 2 Is. So imagine we put tags on the Ms and Is and consider the set [tex]\{M_1, I_1, N, I_2, M_2, U, M_3\}[/tex]. With the tags, there are now 7! arrangements. Now divide by 3! to compensate for the fact that the Ms are actually indistinguishable and divide by 2! to compensate for the fact that the Is as indistinguishable.

Does this make sense to you? It may help to know that the numbers you are calculating are multinomial coefficents: see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinomial_coefficient

The idea makes sense, in terms of number of different rearrangements. But if there are multiple of the same letter, does this not increase the probability of getting that combination?

ie m(1),m(2),m(3)i(1)n(1)i(2)u(1) is the same arrangement in terms of just letters as m(2),m(1),m(3)i(1)n(1)i(2)u(1) etc.
 
UniPhysics90 said:
But if there are multiple of the same letter, does this not increase the probability of getting that combination?

No, because you can divide all of the 7! possible arrangements into groups of 3! 2! arrangements where the Ms and Is are in the same position for all the arrangements in the group.

Each group contains the same number of arrangements, so you can either count the number of groups, or count the total number of arrangements. My previous post did it both ways.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K