Probability Syntax: Types 1, 2 & 3 Defects

  • Thread starter Thread starter SwaGGeReR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
SwaGGeReR
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A certain system can experience three different types of defects. Let A (i=1,2,3) denote the event that the system has a defect of type i. Suppose that

P(A[1]) =.12
P(A[2])=.07
P(A[3])=.05
P(A[1] union A[2])=.13
P(A[1] union A[3])=.14
P(A[2] union A[3])=.10
P(A[1] intersects A[2] intersects A[3])=.01

1.what is the prob that the system does not have a type one defect?

2.what is the prob that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects?

3. What is the prob that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects but not a type 3 defect?

4.What is the prob that the system has at most two of these defects?


I know #1 is .88 and #4 is .99, but I am having difficulty understanding #2 and #3.

For #2: What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects, could that also include a system with ALL the defects (type 1, type 2, AND type 3 defects)? If so, I calculate the probability to be .07:

==>P(A int B) + P(A int B int C)
==>.12 + .07 - .13 + .01
==>.07

If so, then then the probability of #3 is .06.

Let me know if this is right or wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SwaGGeReR said:
For #2: What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects, could that also include a system with ALL the defects (type 1, type 2, AND type 3 defects)?
Yes. The event A_1 \cap A_2 has the event A_1 \cap A_2 \cap A_3 as a subset.

If so, I calculate the probability to be .07:

==>P(A int B) + P(A int B int C)
==>.12 + .07 - .13 + .01
==>.07

By what you said above, you don't have to add the probability of (A int B in C) to the probability of A int B. The probability of A int B already accounts for the probability of A int B int C.

Also, I don't know how you calculated P(A int B).

Use the equation P(A_1 \cup A_2) = P(A_1) + P(A_2) - P(A_1 \cap A_2) and solve it for P(A_1 \cap A_2).
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top